It's pretty clear at this point that
somebody from Buffy is going to be on Angel.
The incessant whiting has made that pretty clear.
So far, however,
I don't know who, when, or for how long. I'd like to keep it that way.
People cross over from other shows. His having a pilot doesn't prevent appearing on Angel. ME SAYING he won't be on Angel, OTOH, sorta does and is what I was objecting to.
[Edited a LOT]
we did know all summer after Season 5 that a) SMG was returning, as Buffy, and ASH was recurring. They were impossible to keep out without discussing nothing all summer long.
In additon to what ita said, that Nick had a pilot (and that pilot discussion didn't get the white font request) means he wasn't available for any shows, anyhow. That's the part I'm not getting. Talking that he shot a pilot/might have another show/might not is allowable to you, but saying
he won't be on Angel (which he couldn't be anyhow, because the pilot could have gotten picked up) isn't allowable? Not to mention, it spoils nothing that is going to occur on screen. I mean, Bette Davis isn't going to be Angel, either.
the news that he had a pilot is an Angel spoiler?
Um, Have to go with the sparkly hottie on this one. Not a spoiler.
I saw the pictures, so I know Daniel means ita.
(nice sparkle btw, ita)
I didn't say Nick's pilot was a spoiler. Go read my white font again. I clarified.
Bette Davis isn't going to be Angel, either.
Damn you! Damn you all t'hell! Aaaaaaaagh!
t sob
/me looks around to see if anyone is buying it.
My simple assumption was that anyone who has another show isn't going to be on Angel. It hadn't occurred to me that was under debate.
No problem Trudy, just a bit of xpostyness...
I just don't want to hear what ME people have to say about casting. That's been the rule all along and I don't know why we can't follow it.