In additon to what ita said, that Nick had a pilot (and that pilot discussion didn't get the white font request) means he wasn't available for any shows, anyhow. That's the part I'm not getting. Talking that he shot a pilot/might have another show/might not is allowable to you, but saying he won't be on Angel (which he couldn't be anyhow, because the pilot could have gotten picked up) isn't allowable? Not to mention, it spoils nothing that is going to occur on screen. I mean, Bette Davis isn't going to be Angel, either.
Ben ,'The Killer In Me'
Buffy 4: Grr. Arrgh.
This is where we talk about Buffy the Vampire Slayer! No spoilers though?if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it. This thread is NO LONGER NAFDA. Please don't discuss current Angel events here.
the news that he had a pilot is an Angel spoiler?
Um, Have to go with the sparkly hottie on this one. Not a spoiler.
I saw the pictures, so I know Daniel means ita.
(nice sparkle btw, ita)
I didn't say Nick's pilot was a spoiler. Go read my white font again. I clarified.
Bette Davis isn't going to be Angel, either.
Damn you! Damn you all t'hell! Aaaaaaaagh!
t sob
/me looks around to see if anyone is buying it.
My simple assumption was that anyone who has another show isn't going to be on Angel. It hadn't occurred to me that was under debate.
No problem Trudy, just a bit of xpostyness...
I just don't want to hear what ME people have to say about casting. That's been the rule all along and I don't know why we can't follow it.
My simple assumption was that anyone who has another show isn't going to be on Angel. It hadn't occurred to me that was under debate.
That was my point. I don't get why it was okay to mention the pilot (or at least, nobody called us on that part). The pilot meant (to me) that he was unavailable anyhow, so we already knew he wasn't going to be on - so what anyone had to say about it didn't change anything we already knew.
I'm with you on not mentioning any maybe- or actual casting spoilers, but don't get this. At any rate, I removed what you asked me to remove before I even asked. I just wanted to understand. I won't mention it again.
I don't mean to get pissy, here. Sorry if I seem so.
I don't read interviews, though. I don't read articles without clearing them through a Buffista-- Salon, TV Guide, EW-- none of them.
Nevertheless, I've already inferred too much and I'm tired of it.