It just makes me angry.

It just occured to me, Nutty, that I swear my fucking head off instead of saying, "Fay, that post is making me so insane with violence and anger, I need to go away, for a very long time, or I'm going to say horrible things to you which I mean right now, but will feel terrible for saying in a week, because I won't mean them, then.

Nutty, sometimes your posts make me angry. I don't tell you. I'm unsure why. Except, I like cursing, and see nothing wrong with it.

Allyson, if your intent was clarification, clearly it failed with me.

If everyone else understood you to mean "Heck, Fay, what you just described isn't at all the kumbaya thing I was talking about", then I am evidently even more obtuse than I thought. It sounded nothing remotely like that to me.

I apologise for the misunderstanding.

And now I'm going to go do something else for a while, and try to calm down.

X post.

Don't feel you have to go away - I'm going to take a breather. But if you're feeling insanely angry and want to vent, go ahead. That's pretty much where you (inadvertently) pushed me to just now, which is why I posted that post, so it's fair enough.

And now I'm going to go do something else for a while, and try to calm down.

As am I.

Except, I like cursing, and see nothing wrong with it.

Um, but will you humor me please, Allyson? I find that cursing can cause a hostile environment, and I find that the posts you put up that have curses in them come off as hostile and rude, and hostility and rudeness have no place on this board.

I'm asking you to be civil, that's all.

Well it offends me Allyson, because I see you as taking a hostile tone.

You say

And then Fay flipped the fuck out.

and I say, Fay did nothing different than what you did.

Her post was obviously fueled by frustration. The difference (and I get that this is a bother some people, doesn't bother others thing) is that your posts seem (to me) aggresive and mean.

t not here at all, honestly

Nutty, I think I'd better apologise for having undoubtedly offended you umpteen times in the past, because I do swear like a trooper. FWIW "And then Fay flipped the fuck out" actually made me laugh out loud, which is a good thing. Because, yes, I really did flip out. I went from calm to foamingly murderous within the space of a few seconds. Irrationally, it seems. Go me with the failure to understand.

t /not here at all, honestly.

As an unrepentant kumbayaer myself I think it's better to discuss a banning pretty thoroughly before it's done-- particularly in ambiguous situations.

It's a bitch but it's, imho, ultimately worth doing.

Once again, I'm in the corner with Allyson and Plei. I think the desire to bend over backwards for the people who are causing trouble is really a slap in the face of the 400 other active posters [note: number pulled out of my ass, but I know it's more than 100] who DO make an effort to play by the rules.

I'm much more of the feeling that you warn them quickly and in no uncertain terms, and if they choose not to heed that, toss their asses.

Because -- and this is going to sound like "I told you so," except I *didn't,* back during the mieskie thing -- the two people who caused trouble and angst and caused US to eat up bandwidth by discussing it to death and beyond? Tossed. (Okay, I *know* mieskie chose to leave, but he would have been suspended, which is a temporary toss.)

We've seen TWICE now that discussing the trolls to death only causes HUGE friction between the people who DO play nice, and has NO effect on the trolls.

And that's why I am very anti-kumbayah.

Yes. This. I hate that we treat warnings like they're the end of the world. If someone is making 10 people nuts or causing people to no longer post in a certain thread, then there is a problem and it needs to be mentioned. It doesn't mean that they're going to get banned. Just that the effects of their bad behavior are going to be pointed out to them. I'd much rather see us warn sooner and save the truly heated debate for the considerably more serious step of suspension.

Bears repeating.

I guess I don't know where I am. I hate the Kumbayah song, I hate the endless discussions (but like ita I can't seem to stop posting) and I hate the idea that my desire to have someone warned might be a result of me being Clearly Insane and Without Humor.

I'm in the middle, I think.

Philosophically, we will find ourselves on a range from tolerant of bullshit to intolerant of bullshit. In person, I have a pretty high tolerance when it comes from a child, and a pretty low tolerance when it comes from an adult. I don't know that we will ever philosophically agree on what is the right level of crap to wade through.

But... I think in practice we do know what we as a group are willing to tolerate. In the most recent instance, I think people were, barring a few people on both ends of the spectrum, in the same place over what to do. I also believe that most of us have a high personal level of tolerance for other people's stupidity, but we hate how it impacts us as a group. For the most part, I didn't like Z's shenaningans, but what upset me was how tumultuous it was for our community. Not for my personal feelings.

I'm beginning get the impression that holding and defending a minority opinion is a *bad* thing to do around here. You know, all it does is slow things down...