Good God!
I go off to do a show, and now I jst had to read 2 MILLION posts in here.
And I have nothing more to say, except that I think ALL my social capital was spent on the voting issue.
Dawn ,'Selfless'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Good God!
I go off to do a show, and now I jst had to read 2 MILLION posts in here.
And I have nothing more to say, except that I think ALL my social capital was spent on the voting issue.
And I have nothing more to say, except that I think ALL my social capital was spent on the voting issue.
Feh.
You spent none. You simply tallied and recapped, a thankless job. If anything, you're the only person in the history of the thread to EARN it here.
Don't forget Nutty with the Cheese Butt. She was a fresh breeze of good-humored rationality when she came in with that proposal. And I remember moonlit making a strong debut in Bureaucracy -- at least that's where I first remember being impressed by her.
And Julie venturing out of UnAmerican. Also for her post in there which I personally wish I had been able to articulate, and were I able to go back in time would have reposted in here because I think it hit on how a lot of us were feeling.
Heather has to stop saying nice things about that post or I'll feel like I've planted my flag in the peak of BuffistaMountain and it's all downhill here from here :)
Now that everyone's been in and asked, I don't know what good posting in Press would do.
The feeling at different times is that many people, especially when pressed for time, will hit Press and Announcements first before they venture into their thread of choice. (I know that's true for me.) And whilst it feels like it all happened forever ago, I bet there are still people who've managed to miss all the excitement.
I also think that Press might give us a nice flat statement that can be linkyed when anyone else does ask. So that the explanation remains consistent. And without individual interpretation. And (fingers crossed that it's not needed) a precedent for next time round would be helpful.
except that I think ALL my social capital was spent on the voting issue.
Sophia, not to make you feel uncomfortable, but I've been reading you for years. And I think you always conduct yourself in the most admirable way, be it Bureaucracy or otherwheres.
You're a Buffista social capital cash cow!
And I have nothing more to say, except that I think ALL my social capital was spent on the voting issue.
Sophia - you're probably the only one who didn't use up a drop of social capital during the voting stuff. Really.
Even I've noticed your sWoHcUiFaFlIcEa!p!i!t!a!l rising through the voteathon, Sophia.
Is this the place we propose new thread titles or the other one?
I can never remember.
Angel is almost done.
How about
Angel III: Big Damn Evil
I was going to say, but many have beaten me to it, that social capital can be lost in Bureaucracy, but it can certainly also be gained. Anyone who jumpstarts a stalled conversation, or makes the formal proposal of something we've all been thinking about, has done a service and gains regard thereby.
We manage a lot by social conformity -- by failing to disagree strenuously due to its not being worth the hassle. I tend to think it would be impossible to codify that entirely into a constitutional document, not without sucking the life out of it all. Which isn't to say I'm not still working on that Buffista Law Summary, because even we forget what rules we've passed, and have to fumble around vaguely, and it would be nice to have a cheatsheet to go back to.
I'll hopefully finish it over the weekend.