Ten seconds and that's it, the first warning goes out. That's right, right?

Yes. I thought she meant deciding on the procedure, not the instantiation.

But we voted on that process, Burrell.

But we voted on that process, Burrell.

Ah, okay. Now me see.

No, I can't see things like charity drives and the F2F working with a board vote. You're right about that. But so far, we haven't done them that way and I don't see a good precedent for starting.

Me neither. I'd go mad. But there's not a clear separation, unless we define it that Buffista activities don't fall under Buffista law. And if we have to vote on that I'll go mad.

Hm. Will you all bake me cookies and bring them to the asylum? And maybe some taco bell for dessert?

Will you all bake me cookies and bring them to the asylum? And maybe some taco bell for dessert?

I'm fairly sure I owe you a batch of cookies just on principle.

I think new threads go up for a vote because we have limited bandwidth and that means not all proposed threads could ever be instituted. I may want a thread called "Please Search the Net for Photos of Guys I Think Are Cute and Post Them Here For Me." but that would be of interest to, well, me, and use a lot of community resources. Charity or the F2F don't use up server space--we can have unlimited supplies of them as long as peoples' pocketbooks and goodwill hold out.

I may want a thread called "Please Search the Net for Photos of Guys I Think Are Cute and Post Them Here For Me." but that would be of interest to, well, me, and use a lot of community resources.

What, you don't want our own version of Drool Streaks?

t coming in carefully, 'cause it looks like things have settled somewhat

I think the issue is that we don't like upsetting people and no matter what we do, one or two people who are not the troll are really, really upset. I don't like upsetting Trudy and connie, I don't like upsetting Kat and Allyson (for example, over the troll issue) Problem is, whatever we do is going to upset someone, so it becomes harder and harder to make the desicions-- either way someone is upset.

In any kind of decision where emotions are involved, someone will be upset. Sad, but true. Despite what we're taught in self esteem classes, not everyone is the winner, someone's viewpoint is going to lose.

Primarily, though, I'm bringing this up because this is the third time I've found myself being held up as a figurehead of whatever side I'm on, and it's both highly disconcerting and delightful. I mean, I consider myself apathetic in the extreme, anti-social, and essentially curmudgeonly. In addition to the lovely company I'm paired with--Hi, Trudy!--I feel I should be practicing the words to "Le Marseilles (sp)" and chanting "Equalite, Liberte, Fraternite!" and all that. No guillotines, I promise.

No insights into processes or resolutions of difficult matters. Just a bit of "Gosh!" at the situation itself and where I find myself therein.

So, Allyson, will they accept chocolate chip cookies where you'll be? And where do you stand on the transcendently important question of "Nuts or No Nuts"? I'm in the Anti-Nut Camp, myself. To the barricades.

I vote for a cute pictures thread!

edit: but we don't need two of them