That's my girl, large and in-charge. Okay, teensy-weensy and in charge.

Gunn ,'Just Rewards (2)'


Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


aurelia - May 10, 2003 12:22:54 am PDT #1614 of 10005
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.

Possibly because I find the layers of funny in Touched By A Crazy Person: Wonder Falls and Other Post-Grad Projects a touch too amusing for my own good.

Oh yeah.

And just from what I've observed in the few months I've been on this board, I think alum projects (including those of the actors) will find the most appropriate home whether that is the occasional discussion in Natter, the aforementioned Post-Grad thread, or an obvious need for a dedicated thread.

The ratio of pilots to open slots this year is ridiculous. There are not that many slots opening, and the number of pilots under consideration is quite large.

Does discussion of pilot status and new (unconfirmed) projects take place in the spoiler threads? I just wondered...


DCJensen - May 10, 2003 12:56:46 am PDT #1615 of 10005
All is well that ends in pizza.

When did the Firefly thread get created in reference to the time frame of the show?


askye - May 10, 2003 1:05:59 am PDT #1616 of 10005
Thrive to spite them

The original Firefly thread was created on WX and I think created almost as soon as we knew that it was being filmed.


Laura - May 10, 2003 8:26:36 am PDT #1617 of 10005
Our wings are not tired.

It seems like the Firefly spoiler thread could morph into a general A/TV Spoiler thread.


Michele T. - May 10, 2003 10:27:04 am PDT #1618 of 10005
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

PPO is, if anything, now the default bad Clexfic snark thread.

Well, then that could go in the fanfic *reading* thread.


brenda m - May 10, 2003 10:34:56 am PDT #1619 of 10005
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Aside from merging/closing/adapting the Buffy threads, I'd really rather not monkey with the existing threads unless there's a compelling need. Sure, Smallville and Due South could be merged, maybe some of the fic threads, etc., but right now, these threads are all in use and have their own tone and atmosphere. Why mess with that unless we really need to?


Michele T. - May 10, 2003 10:39:40 am PDT #1620 of 10005
with a gleam in my eye, and an almost airtight alibi

Why mess with that unless we really need to?

Why put strain on the database that's unnecessary?


DavidS - May 10, 2003 11:12:41 am PDT #1621 of 10005
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

While I'm generally in favor of preserving the flavor of threads, I'm also open to the idea of combining. Threads change over time anyway. Combining the Smallville/Due South threads might be a useful way to consolidate the HoYay fans which could bring in more of the community or spark more conversation. I'm not necessarily advocating that, just using it as an example that consolidation shouldn't be seen as a deathstroke to a particular sub-community but could be a positive way to re-energize discussion.

We grandfathered a lot of threads over from WX that wouldn't be voted in now. We do need to be conscious of Thread Spread, and consolidation might be necessary. I just don't think it should be seen as a pure negative.


Kat - May 10, 2003 1:03:55 pm PDT #1622 of 10005
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

Whoa. I don't post or read for a day or so and this all blossoms.

Iffen it matters:

1. I'm still anti-thread proliferation.
2. I'm pro-thread combination, but I have a feeling that you will find that the people who post in the current threads won't be so thrilled at the prospect. For example, if Smallville is the only thread in which I post regularly and it gets sucked into something else, then I could see not wanting non-participants to define what happens to it for me.
3. Given #2, I think we should proceed with extreme caution in opening threads. IF we don't like to close or combine those fledgling threads with minimal posts, then if we ever start new ones, we'll face the same battle.
4. I wholeheartedly agree before we do housekeeping etc., we need a state of the Board convo on Who We Want To Be.

That is all.


Theodosia - May 10, 2003 3:41:16 pm PDT #1623 of 10005
'we all walk this earth feeling we are frauds. The trick is to be grateful and hope the caper doesn't end any time soon"

One method for determining thread closure that no one has discussed is low-or-no-usage. If a thread falls into disuse, it should be pretty clear that it's no longer needed. As long as two Atlantic Canadians are left posting to each other (and I hope it never comes to that, because they're all wonderful members of this online community), their specific thread has a good use here.

Perhaps a metric should be established to say, "If a thread has less than X posts in Y time period from Z different posters it will be considered for closure" and that would eliminate some uncertainty in the general thread closure process.