I am assuming that this one will be voted in as well.
I take it you haven't been over to the discussion thread. There seems very little chance of that.
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I am assuming that this one will be voted in as well.
I take it you haven't been over to the discussion thread. There seems very little chance of that.
Burrell, read the recent posts in Lightbulb. This one is not getting voted in, and recently there's discussion about whether the proposer can truncate the procedure if he so chooses and what effect that would have on the issue.
I take it you haven't been over to the discussion thread. There seems very little chance of that.
No, you're right. Unfortunately, due to time constraints, I won't be able to read it until tomorrow probably. This is one issue I won't be joining in on.
Am I the only one who is surprise to see so many of the Official Seconds coming from people who claim to be against the proposal?
Not at all. If something came up that I wanted off the table, seconding it is a good way to get it closer to a moratorium.
Burrell, not to worry. I'm getting shellacked in there. It would've been a blessing not to have gotten the seconds.
If something came up that I wanted off the table, seconding it is a good way to get it closer to a moratorium.
Yeah, and also, I'd rather see the processing in the Light Bulb thread than in here.
And see if I didn't want a proposal to pass or be discussed I wouldn't comment on it at all. I would hope it would just die.
And see if I didn't want a proposal to pass or be discussed I wouldn't comment on it at all. I would hope it would just die.
msbelle is like me. I'm glad to see that ita, DX, & Jesse & others have more faith in the process than I do. Especially right now, when I am being lax in my Buffista civic mindedness.
Hello, Bureau-thinkers. I am in search of a commune to consense with me. We will chant OM and all agree on the following consensuary procedure-details. Which are not tort related in any way:
(1) I think it's a great idea that the proposer of a proposal be allowed to withdraw it before the voting period begins, for any reason and without censure or tongue-waggling. (Unless the proposer prefers we waggle our tongues at him.) If the proposer, I don't know, breaks a leg and gets stuck in a hospital with no internet access, or even just changes his mind, there should be the option for the proposer to hand-off advocacy duties to someone else (and stick to the original time-frame).
(2) Said proposal, never having been voted down, should not fall under the moratorium for voted-down things.
Please let us consense about them, because then I will be happy and able to put them into my little Buffista Law document.
That is all. Off to find cake to satisfy sudden craving.
Works for me, Nutty.