Thanks, Nilly. I was using the last proposal as a template, and just wanted to make sure.
'Never Leave Me'
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Since the proposer is responsible for posting the call to vote, I think He/She should also think about making the timeing of that posting at a good time for them (ex NOT at midnight EST when you are an east coast morning person and in bed by ten or something). I mean, I think we should feel free to change it.
I agree Sophia, but I'm usually up around midnight, anyway, especially on a Friday night, so I just went with it.
Oh good! I just don't want us to get locked in so I thought I would bring it up.
Does anyone else have any comments on my short "how to vote?" Do we think it should go up somewhere handy or wait for the full version/history that Nutty is working on?
Sophia, I'll incorporate it into the larger. Like, "Here is what we do. Here is a checklist of what to do, in order." Like on (good) graduate applications: they do it in prose, and then they do it in a bulleted list, just to make sure everyone can find the details easily.
Obviously coming in late to the party, but this comment seems more appropriate for here than for the formal discussion.
Am I the only one who is surprise to see so many of the Official Seconds coming from people who claim to be against the proposal? I hope that they won't be disappointed when/if it gets voted in, given that so far we have voted in every single proposal that has been raised. I am assuming that this one will be voted in as well. If it were me, if I were against a proposal I would not be so generous as to Second it. I guess that makes me officially a less generous person.
I am assuming that this one will be voted in as well.
I take it you haven't been over to the discussion thread. There seems very little chance of that.
Burrell, read the recent posts in Lightbulb. This one is not getting voted in, and recently there's discussion about whether the proposer can truncate the procedure if he so chooses and what effect that would have on the issue.
I take it you haven't been over to the discussion thread. There seems very little chance of that.
No, you're right. Unfortunately, due to time constraints, I won't be able to read it until tomorrow probably. This is one issue I won't be joining in on.
Am I the only one who is surprise to see so many of the Official Seconds coming from people who claim to be against the proposal?
Not at all. If something came up that I wanted off the table, seconding it is a good way to get it closer to a moratorium.