Like other people have said, I don't really see the point, but am happy to second the proposal to move it to Formal Discussion time.
Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
Alright. That makes 4. I'm opening the thread. DX? Ready?
No, because I have to go to a meeting. Back in a bit.
I don't like the proposal, but I'll talk about why later.
Sophia, that looks like a very good, clear summation.
I've posted the announcement in Press and in Lightbulb. Could someone else check the Press announcement to make sure I got the dates right?
Lightbuld discussion starts here:
DXMachina "Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!" May 5, 2003 1:24:15 pm EDT
Since I wasn't really clear before, I meant that just because I didn't bring up the vote on "old issues" doesn't mean it isn't important to me that it be voted on. I'd really like to see this become the next issue in lightbulbs regardless of whether we have a list of "old issues" or not.
As I understand, someone (Anne W, I think) is still putting together that list, but it's been held up a bit by board and RL events. When it's complete, or nearly so, I think we'll get a discussion and vote.
make sure I got the dates right?
Discussion: NOW - 5/9/03 11:59 pm EST Voting: 5/10/03 12 am EST - 5/13/03 12:00 am EST
DXM, the discussion ends on the 9th, so there are full 4 days of discussion and some more - a part of today, so 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, with only the last 4 days being full, because today has already started, right? If that's what you intended (and that's how it was in most of the former votes-discussions), then your numbers are good (like there was any doubt of that).
Thanks, Nilly. I was using the last proposal as a template, and just wanted to make sure.