Jayne: We was just about to spring into action, Captain. Complicated escape and rescue op. Wash: I was going to watch. It was very exciting.

'Shindig'


Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Julie - Apr 23, 2003 8:49:06 pm PDT #1136 of 10005

So it seems that the better episodes generate more discussion. We have four episodes left - shall we estimate 3000 posts for each? And some more room for anticipation, natter, and speculation?

That means that the final episode might be discussed in the thread after next.

I dunno, Elena. That seems optimistic. Conversations with Dead People was a great episode and it was, what? not even 1500 posts. I think that the time between episodes is a bigger factor than the quality of the episode. I'd be surprised if any of the next four generate more than 2000 a piece. It's the end, so people will have a lot to say, but then they're coming one after the other now, so they'll only have a week to say it.

So there'll be a lot of discussion in the wrap, and yes, that will create another thread. But before 7/22? I doubt it.

I always liked Oz's 4/22 line ".... and we're done".

"Grr Arrgh" is more like an exclamation mark after the show is concluded.

So it could work that way too.

But definitely "Grrr Arrgh" needs to get a chance to wear a title tiara, and flaunt its thready glory!


Jessica - Apr 23, 2003 9:29:53 pm PDT #1137 of 10005
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

So it seems that the better episodes generate more discussion.

Um...

Conversations with Dead People, 1368.
Showtime, 2721.

But it does seem that my 400 posts guess was a wee bit off.


Elena - Apr 23, 2003 9:53:53 pm PDT #1138 of 10005
Thanks for all the fish.

So it seems that the better episodes generate more discussion

Which, yes, was not entirely accurate, was it. Thing is, so many of the episodes have been entirely unmemorable.


Steph L. - Apr 23, 2003 10:00:31 pm PDT #1139 of 10005
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

There's a few S7 eps I can't tell apart -- Bring on the Night, Get It Done, Showtime. It's all like one big Uber-vamp episode.

I vote Big Damn Evil, Sir.


Elena - Apr 23, 2003 10:14:14 pm PDT #1140 of 10005
Thanks for all the fish.

So, between the current Buffy thread and the upcoming one we have just under 12000 posts. Do we think that the last 4 eps will fit in there?

And, really, why am I so tied up with this? Because we should just wait to see what happens with the next episode. If it generates 3000 posts, then we might reasonably expect to have 2 threads between now and the last episode.


Deena - Apr 23, 2003 11:08:33 pm PDT #1141 of 10005
How are you me? You need to stop that. Only I can be me. ~Kara

Or, we could name the next one, "Grrr Argh" and then, if there's one after that, name it "And We're Done".


Lee - Apr 23, 2003 11:18:04 pm PDT #1142 of 10005
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

or after grr argh, have "can we rest"


Burrell - Apr 23, 2003 11:28:29 pm PDT #1143 of 10005
Why did Darth Vader cross the road? To get to the Dark Side!

Call me nuts, but isn't there just a chance that the amount of discussion between episodes is at least partially dependent on the length of time between new episodes?


§ ita § - Apr 23, 2003 11:33:40 pm PDT #1144 of 10005
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Not to mention a bunch of other random factors (were there any grammar wars in there?)


Elena - Apr 23, 2003 11:41:33 pm PDT #1145 of 10005
Thanks for all the fish.

Filbert!

Brazil!

Cashew!

But you're also right, Burrell.