Right, banning is not a voting issue, but I feel like bypassing our stated procedure should be. In part so that lurkers or others who don't want to post right now but would vote could be included.
Agreed.
So I guess the other question is, what happens if we don't get a quorum? Which is 42 voters.
Are there stats available via the host? Is there a way to get an approximate number for active posters to see if our quorum number is still reasonable?
I am for the ban, but a little uneasy about it being a consensus decision. At the very least we do need to give some time for people in case there may be some who are offline on the weekend.
So I guess the other question is, what happens if we don't get a quorum? Which is 42 voters.
I went back & did a head count, and more than 42 of us have weighed in on this already. (I stopped counting past 42.) I would expect we'd all vote.
I counted 61 different people weighing in so far.
Make it 62. I just want him off the board one way or another. As he hurt even one of us, he hurt all of us.
editted to correct condition of statement.
My heart is broken. Sunil is an unofficial member of my RL family. But I cannot ignore the voices of those he has hurt. I support the BS consensus.
The revised proposal is here: Dana "Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!" Oct 16, 2016 11:09:08 am PDT
If I remember correctly, and it's three days of discussion, that would mean starting the vote on the 18th.
I'm sorry, Laga. This isn't easy for a lot us us. It brought out my mama bear instincts though. My cubs have been hurt.
I am shocked. I'm sorry that anyone felt uncomfortable and I'm grateful to Jessica for sharing her experience. I support the members of the board who have been hurt and whatever needs to be done to make the board a safe place. Thank you Dana for speaking up.
That's all that I've got because I'm still processing.
Right, banning is not a voting issue, but I feel like bypassing our stated procedure should be.
That seems reasonable to me.