Willow, check you out! Witch-Fu!

Buffy ,'Lessons'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


Fay - Apr 09, 2009 9:58:29 am PDT #9095 of 10289
"Fuck Western ideologically-motivated gender identification!" Sulu gasped, and came.

t incapable of shutting up

Strega, did you notice the change you made from the line you quoted about SFF and your own statement about SF? Because from a quick Google, whilst I'd agree that Cupid doesn't look at all like Science Fiction, I'd certainly say it falls within the SFF genre, if it's about an Ancient Greek god being made mortal and whacky highjinks ensuing. That's fantasy, surely, and thus within the scope of SFF? Or what would you call it, if not fantasy?


omnis_audis - Apr 09, 2009 10:04:30 am PDT #9096 of 10289
omnis, pursue. That's an order from a shy woman who can use M-16. - Shir

I didn't realize Natter was a TV discussion zone. I thought Natter was, well, natter. My mistake. But I'll get on the bus that says, that one moves way too fast, and has way too much other talk, to try and follow talk about a show. Do I want to propose eliminating TV talk from there? NO! It's not for me to say, and I don't feel strongly enough to even suggest.

I confess, I do not follow in the bucket threads, because, often with work, I'm too far behind, and don't want to be spoiled. I'm 2 weeks behind in Dollhouse, and 200 posts or so in Jossverse, as that is the only one I do subscribe to.

That said, I think the problem isn't *having* the bucket threads. But more, determining what show goes where, and making an announcement that lets folks know. When the final wording for the vote happens, might I suggest something worded along the lines of "and to announce show "x" is being discussed in ____."

Maybe it's just me. I don't read that many threads to know where to look to discuss stuff. But making an announcement might reduce that confusion for all. Who makes that determination and when? Well. Not a clue.

As for whitefont on the iPhone. Ita & team made it so you can adjust what spoiler font color is. I use a pale yellow. I can zoom in to read it on the iPhone, or just scroll past not quite able to read it. Problem solved.


Jessica - Apr 09, 2009 10:05:16 am PDT #9097 of 10289
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

if it's about an Ancient Greek god being made mortal and whacky highjinks ensuing.

My understanding is that he claims to be an ancient Greek god, but it's equally if not more likely that he's a delusional mental patient. (Hence the reason his love interest is also his psychiatrist.)

[eta: Was Joan of Arcadia discussed in BS? I honestly can't remember. If it was, Cupid probably belongs there too.]


Kristen - Apr 09, 2009 10:10:00 am PDT #9098 of 10289

I look at Cupid like a Wonderfalls. And, had there not been a Minearverse, it never would have occurred to me to look in Boxed Set for the Wonderfalls discussion. I understand the reasoning now but those shows (like Ally McBeal or Eli Stone) don't feel SciFi -- or even SyFy (HA!) -- to me.


Jessica - Apr 09, 2009 10:11:42 am PDT #9099 of 10289
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

Hilariously, a quick Nilly for JoA discussion leads here:

Theodosia "Boxed Set, Vol. 1: Smallville, Due South, Farscape" Apr 12, 2004 3:52:23 pm PDT


JenP - Apr 09, 2009 10:30:07 am PDT #9100 of 10289

like Ally McBeal

Ha! I was thinking about where that one would have gone out on the porch a while ago. But I decided it was her own psychoses at play. Is that what Eli Stone is like, too?


Liese S. - Apr 09, 2009 10:31:09 am PDT #9101 of 10289
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

Just as a datapoint, Kings isn't just AU; there are fantasy elements in it, crown of butterflies, smoke blowing against the wind. I mean, there's evidently an extant and functioning "God" character who does stuff and directs people.

I realize that this makes me, one of the board's putative Christians, positing the verifiable existence of God in a show as classifying it as fantasy, but I'm willing to roll with the irony.

But really, it seems pretty clear as an "F" in SFF to me.


Liese S. - Apr 09, 2009 10:33:30 am PDT #9102 of 10289
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

And back on the larger point, I think it's worthwhile to go through the exercise of thinking through how we use things periodically, as we do. I hope we can keep tempers on a even keel as clearly we use things and perceive things differently, but primarily I hope we're still a community that cares about each other and wants to talk to each other about awesome stuff. So we'll shape how we do that, and that's a good thing.


Dana - Apr 09, 2009 10:33:48 am PDT #9103 of 10289
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.

Plus, Al Swearigen has not said "cocksucker" once.


JenP - Apr 09, 2009 10:37:52 am PDT #9104 of 10289

Just as a datapoint, Kings isn't just AU; there are fantasy elements in it

Ah, I did not know that about Kings. What I get for talking about something I haven't seen... even though I admitted it!

Well, it seems, then, that if there's a show where there's doubt about how to classify, we discuss and decide? [ETA: I would say in Bureau, not Natter.] Yyyyeahhhh, because coming to agreement is likely. I suppose if it's really a hot debate, we could vote.

What's the show in contention right now, Cupid? And is Eli Stone discussed anywhere? Should there be Network Drama to round out Cable, Premium, and Comedy?