Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
well, my only point is that we seem to be trying to make it harder to create threads and requiring more agreement does that, ragrdless of how many people care enough to vote.
( of course, I wasn't here yet for the original voting debacle so I haven't seen inside the can yet.)
So if we pegged it as high as 72 and eliminated No Preference, then only three of the last seven threads would've been enacted.
Not all of those votes were about opening threads. Of the last five(I don't have time to go back and really do this right now), three were about opening threads (if you consider the votes to open Procedurals and Comedy separately, even though they were on the same ballot), one was about closing a thread, and one was about supporting the WGA strike.
Gaming thread: 83 total; 76 Y/N
Strike support: 65 total; 64 Y/N
Close Firefly thread: 73 total; no NP option
Open Procedurals: 76 total; 65 Y/N
Open Comedy: 76 total; 61 Y/N
Stephanie, a larger consensus or the need to reach what is consensus is actually, I think, what moved us to voting. People felt that the talkiest people pushed their way through the process with consensus.
With voting, the talky people get to talk to their hearts content (well, at least for 4 days, then they have to shut it), even if others are irked or annoyed by it. Then everyone gets a vote and the vote is the thing that matters. It made it more so that the quieter voices still got heard.
Did anyone hear the thing about Republican House of Reps voting as "present" on the funding bill? It cracked me up because for them it was intended, I think, as a protest (and possibly political coverage?) Made me laugh.
If No Preference never matters, then why have it?
I heard that on NPR this morning and laughed and laughed. I didnt even know they could vote present.
As to the rest, I will just watch and see what develops. (I guess I am one of the quieter types.)
I’m kind of a fan of the no preference option, although my reasons are more real-worldy and less board-related. In RL, I’m a serious campaigner for an abstention option on every ballot. I’m not sure if those issues have ever been relevant in a board vote, but I’d be loathe to take away someone’s right to engage in a vote without wanting to support an argument on either side.
I’d be loathe to take away someone’s right to engage in a vote without wanting to support an argument on either side.
I like the phrasing of that, it clarifies my own feelings on No Preference. I see NP as a statement of "Yes, I've listened to your arguments but neither of you have persuaded me that one of you is more right than the other. However, this needs to be settled, so I am voting." If an issue gets several NPs, it's worth taking note that a high degree of ambivalence exists on the issue. Granted, that doesn't make a difference to the actual issue once it's decided, but as a gauge of the mindset of the board it can be very useful.
I am unable to see how eliminating NP is keeping people down - if people are ambivilent to an issue, why do they care that it gets resolved? why don't they just step away from the discussion or MARCIE the people they are bothered by, if staying away from a discussion requires more self-control than they can muster?
I am lost at the need to participate in deciding on something you don't care about.
I am lost at the need to participate in deciding on something you don't care about.
This is why I made the point about not being sure if my issues with it have ever come up on the board. The votes always seem to be a binary, yes/no, kind of a thing. But if there's ever a vote that's not binary, that's an either/or vote, then I'd really want the no preference vote there.
I think we make everything a yes no vote because of the "no preferential voting" thing. Which doesn't seem to be documented anywhere except the places where it is SEARED INTO MY BRAIN.
But if there's ever a vote that's not binary, that's an either/or vote, then I'd really want the no preference vote there.
As I mentioned earlier, I think this has only happened when there's a sub-vote to the main proposal, i.e. spoilers or not, or waiting period.