the majority of us can ignore the posts when they start?
That's my girl... That's my good girl.
Kaylee ,'Serenity'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
msbelle - Apr 18, 2008 10:12:23 am PDT #8522 of 10289
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
P.M. Marc - Apr 18, 2008 10:18:23 am PDT #8523 of 10289
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
"Other Media" is liberally named, but was originally a thread specifically for comics and graphic novels. I think if we compare the interest base (in terms of Buffistas and in terms of products to discuss) for graphic media to the base for games, we'd see close to parity.
As I recall from the dim recesses of my memory, it was originally a thread to discuss the Jossverse in any other media form, inclusive of games, tie-in novels, what have you.
Volans - Apr 18, 2008 10:27:10 am PDT #8524 of 10289
move out and draw fire
it was originally a thread to discuss the Jossverse in any other media form
I defer to your dim recesses. I guess there wasn't enough activity on the Buffy XBox game or RPG for anyone to post there about games, and I for one wouldn't have felt right posting in OM about non-Jossverse games.
Another alternative: The gamers could take over Sang Sacre, since it's already sort of an RPG / Virtual World / (not-massively) Multiplayer Online thing.
amych - Apr 18, 2008 10:27:52 am PDT #8525 of 10289
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
As I recall from the dim recesses of my memory, it was originally a thread to discuss the Jossverse in any other media form, inclusive of games, tie-in novels, what have you.
Yes. The media shrank and the universe expanded (in practice, not by rule, just to be very clear about that point.)
Polter-Cow - Apr 18, 2008 10:28:24 am PDT #8526 of 10289
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!
Another alternative: The gamers could take over Sang Sacre, since it's already sort of an RPG / Virtual World / (not-massively) Multiplayer Online thing.
I don't like that idea, since I'm more interested in the gaming thread to talk about non-RPG video games.
NoiseDesign - Apr 18, 2008 10:35:29 am PDT #8527 of 10289
Our wings are not tired
the majority of us can ignore the posts when they start?
I think it is presumptive to assume majority.
Pix - Apr 18, 2008 10:40:16 am PDT #8528 of 10289
We're all getting played with, babe. -Weird Barbie
I defer to your dim recesses.No time to chime in on the main issue, but I really t heart this and want to tag it. May I?
msbelle - Apr 18, 2008 10:45:54 am PDT #8529 of 10289
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
ok.
Jesse - Apr 18, 2008 10:46:35 am PDT #8530 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Especially when there's a risk of being spoiled (in the case of games, you can be spoiled for computer games...at least you could back when they had stories), I don't like taking that risk.
Would this become a problem in a general games thread?
megan walker - Apr 18, 2008 10:48:57 am PDT #8531 of 10289
"What kind of magical sunshine and lollipop world do you live in? Because you need to be medicated."-SFist
the majority of us can ignore the posts when they start?
I meant that the fact that this level of debate occurs is a problem for all of us, as a community. But I guess what I meant is that I think it should be considered a problem and I don't think you should have to ignore bureaucracy.
However, I also don't think that people who want a new thread shouldn't propose one, or that people who don't want any new threads shouldn't particpate in said proposal debate.