We'd probably argue about what constitutes "cancelled"....
Stop means no. And no means no. So . . . stop.
Xander ,'Conversations with Dead People'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
Sophia Brooks - Oct 26, 2007 7:01:48 am PDT #7881 of 10289
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
Dana - Oct 26, 2007 7:02:30 am PDT #7882 of 10289
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
We'd probably argue about what constitutes "cancelled"....
And what counted as "aired."
Vortex - Oct 26, 2007 7:17:36 am PDT #7883 of 10289
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
Well, as someone who liked, but did not love, Firefly, I have no problem getting rid of it. But, there are a lot of people who had/have great love for the show, so I would respect their love for the show.
Jesse - Oct 26, 2007 7:30:49 am PDT #7884 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I don't know why I feel like it makes a difference, but I do, that it's not a question of closing down a thread, it's a question of not making a new thread when the current one hits 10,000. I know it's the same result, but somehow it feels different in my head. I think because a thread with 50 posts sitting in it feels sadder than one with 8000, even if there aren't a lot of new ones.
§ ita § - Oct 26, 2007 7:34:26 am PDT #7885 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I think that's part of it for me, Jesse. The poor little thread with barely any traffic doesn't feel right to me--it's sadder than no thread at all, since it's highlighting how done Firefly is.
Jesse - Oct 26, 2007 7:41:05 am PDT #7886 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
OK, here's a question: can we take away the post limit on that thread?
megan walker - Oct 26, 2007 7:42:22 am PDT #7887 of 10289
"What kind of magical sunshine and lollipop world do you live in? Because you need to be medicated."-SFist
The poor little thread with barely any traffic doesn't feel right to me--it's sadder than no thread at all, since it's highlighting how done Firefly is.
This is how I feel about it.
§ ita § - Oct 26, 2007 7:43:55 am PDT #7888 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
can we take away the post limit on that thread?
Not without cheating in the code. I guess I could put something in so that not every thread caps at 10K, but at that point I'd rather just start another thread because it's disproportionate bother.
Jesse - Oct 26, 2007 7:56:35 am PDT #7889 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Ah. Oh well.
Matt the Bruins fan - Oct 26, 2007 8:05:24 am PDT #7890 of 10289
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
While my feelings about not starting a new thread that will have a handful of occasional but impassioned users are pretty ambivalent, my feelings about asking ita and other B.org programmers to modify the way board architecture works (and possibly risk operational hiccups) to stretch the current thread for those same users amounts to a big "Oh HELL NO!"