You know, I've saved lives. Dozens. Maybe hundreds. I reattached a girl's leg. Her whole leg. She named her hamster after me. I got a hamster. He drops a box of money, he gets a town.

Simon ,'Jaynestown'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


Sophia Brooks - Jul 27, 2007 10:27:23 am PDT #7556 of 10289
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

I wasn't making a non-proliferationist argument.

I apologize-- I misread that and I didn't mean to misrepresent your words. The point I was attempting to make is that I don't really see tons of people advocating and wanting a different thread for everything, just a few posts about it.


Laura - Jul 27, 2007 10:28:19 am PDT #7557 of 10289
Our wings are not tired.

I didn't really use the experimentals so I can't comment on their success.

I like the just right sized bucket threads with shows breaking off when they outgrow the bucket. I also like whitefont discussion of shows when they air in Natter.

These things work for me. Spoilers don't bother me because I skim easily and forget stuff quickly.


sumi - Jul 27, 2007 10:34:31 am PDT #7558 of 10289
Art Crawl!!!

Quick question: have we ever made a show thread from shows discussed in Natter?

I know we have a couple from shows discussed in Boxed Set.


tiggy - Jul 27, 2007 10:36:44 am PDT #7559 of 10289
I do believe in killing the messenger, you know why? Because it sends a message. ~ Damon Salvatore

I agree with Kat about almost everything she just said. except the anti stance. i'm neither anti nor pro.

I do like having dedicated threads to discuss tv shows with the people here, but i also know that if we have a Network Drama thread with no whitefont at all, i'm going to be limited in when i can go in because i just don't stay caught up on my shows anymore. to go even further than that though, i'd probably stay out the thread anyway until i've seen all the shows in question because i'm just not very likely to go back and try to find a post somebody made about a show days ago that i just caught up on. i'm lazy like that.

I am kind of hoping we end up with some kind of thread because if it stays in Natter, i see Natter's post going back up and me not being able to keep up. if it has it's own thread, i'll be able to keep up in both places. hypothetically speaking.


Frankenbuddha - Jul 27, 2007 10:45:57 am PDT #7560 of 10289
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"

Quick question: have we ever made a show thread from shows discussed in Natter?

I think the the non-fiction and cable threads have shows that were all discussed in Natter at one point (if they were around prior to the threads). Probably premium cable as well (though that would have been mostly Sopranos / Deadwood talk).

Did LOST and VM come out of natter? I don't think LOST ever got discussed in Box Set, despite it being definitely a genre show (either because it wasn't especially media fandom-ish or because that's where all the ALIAS talk was). If so, I think those were the only dedicated threads to come out of there.


brenda m - Jul 27, 2007 10:47:18 am PDT #7561 of 10289
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

It's honest in that it's probably what would satisfy the people who watch those shows.

I don't actually think so. I think in most cases those threads would stagnate and die.

And frankly for people who want focused discussion, that's a much more simple approach because it cuts down all of the non-specific-show chatter. It also avoids something like SPN/Boxed Set from happening where people suddenly neither want a new thread but feel like they can't discuss comfortably in the thread they were in.

Okay, this happened once, and it was unfortunate. But our history of dealing with things when we can see there's a critical mass forming is better, overall. Natter spun out of Buffy. So did Bitches. Due South out of Bitches. (Possibly Smallville and Farscape too, I disremember.) We could see a tidal wave of LOTR coming, so we were able to shunt that out of Natter/Movies ahead of time. Etc.

It also means for people like ND and Kristin who don't want to be spoiled for other things they watch, they can avoid it.

That's the tougher bit, and I'm not sure the best way to handle. But I don't see overlapping Natter and Ded-Thread discussions as a bad thing, personally.


Zenkitty - Jul 27, 2007 11:07:02 am PDT #7562 of 10289
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

there is greater fragmentation of the community and also a sort of bizarre "me and my 5 friends have our own special place" vibe. The last part, in my opinion, is shitty and it changes the way the community socializes but perhaps that is the way the community feels now: hunker down and give me my thread.

I agree with most of what Kat said. To the above, I think that even if me and my 5 friends had a special thread to talk about, say, Dresden Files (I won't let it go), those of us who wanted to have wider discussions with the community would also be in Natter or Bitches, and probably other threads too. And those of us who didn't wouldn't be in the other threads anyway.

I'm not advocating single-show threads so much as thinking that I don't see how moving tv tak anywhere will necessarily impact the community discussions in Natter and Bitches. Except for removing the issues that apparently keep some people from posting in Natter/Bitches who would if they weren't worried about getting spoiled.

Eh. I'd really like a poll done to find out how many people avoid which threads and why. Is spoilers the problem? Is it whitefont, the annoyance or the lack of it? Is it the fragmentation of discussion? Is it the pace of the posts? Voting is intended to give us the will of the majority, but until we get an idea of how the people as a whole feel, we may not be putting the "right" issues to the vote.

Does that make sense? I mean, we keep voting on this thread and that thread, and we keep having exactly the same arguments/discussions/points made every time. It's solving things for people who want specific threads, but it isn't solving the overall question. Whatever the overall question actually is. I think it's "How do we want our community to be organized, now that the central thing we were organized around is gone?"


Connie Neil - Jul 27, 2007 12:03:47 pm PDT #7563 of 10289
brillig

Network Drama thread with no whitefont at all

Here we have a point to work from. How about Network Drama with 24 hour whitefont? It can certainly be an option to vote on.


Beverly - Jul 27, 2007 1:16:35 pm PDT #7564 of 10289
Days shrink and grow cold, sunlight through leaves is my song. Winter is long.

Voting is intended to give us the will of the majority, but until we get an idea of how the people as a whole feel, we may not be putting the "right" issues to the vote.

This is how I feel.


Pix - Jul 27, 2007 2:35:39 pm PDT #7565 of 10289
We're all getting played with, babe. -Weird Barbie

Except for removing the issues that apparently keep some people from posting in Natter/Bitches who would if they weren't worried about getting spoiled.
To be clear, I've never worried about being spoiled in Natter or Bitches. Whitefont makes that a non-issue for me. I generally don't talk TV in those threads just because the conversation has moved on by the time I want to talk about it, but that's my issue, not the board's.

The only current thread that I don't go into because of worries about being spoiled is Boxed Set, and, as I've said, I accepted that that thread as it's configured isn't for me anyway. I wouldn't want to take Boxed Set away from those who love it; TV just isn't worth this level of contention to me.

It also means for people like ND and Kristin who don't want to be spoiled for other things they watch, they can avoid it.
That's the tougher bit, and I'm not sure the best way to handle. But I don't see overlapping Natter and Ded-Thread discussions as a bad thing, personally.

I appreciate that my voice is being heard, but it's so difficult to know how many people want what, and I'm wary about becoming a spokesperson for anyone else. I agree that single threads would be accessible to more people, but I also recognize that single-threads are a dealbreaker for others who I care about here.

Maybe it's just that I have other things on my mind, but I'm just not up for the level of discussion it would take to make substantial changes one way or the other right now. Yes, I'm being conflict-avoidant, which will doubtless frustrate ND, but...I guess I just agree with whomever it was who said that it would be nice to have a bit of a breather from this discussion so close on the heels of the SPN debate.

Not sure if any of that is helpful. Just throwing it out there since my name came up.