I could squeeze you until you popped like warm champagne, and you'd beg me to hurt you just a little bit more.

Fuffy ,'Storyteller'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


Zenkitty - Jul 16, 2007 5:32:40 pm PDT #7167 of 10289
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

when shows are back to back like they are/were on Sci-fi Friday, you sort of have to delay the conversation about the first show to do/make it through the W-n-P for the second.

Yeah, but when the first show comes on at 10pm, waiting until midnight Eastern (my time) means I'm asleep, or should be, by the time second-show-talk has petered out. I dunno. Maybe there's just no really good answer.

Hi, JenP! How YOU doin'?


DXMachina - Jul 16, 2007 5:34:10 pm PDT #7168 of 10289
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

Has this actually happened?

The one I most remember was the one I referenced early in this discussion. There were new eps of both Dresden and BSG, but the comments got swamped. I thought it happened to Dresden again later, but it looks like I was mistaken.


Nutty - Jul 16, 2007 5:34:13 pm PDT #7169 of 10289
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

For example, Battlestar Galactica discussion was similarly dominant in the thread at one point—though perhaps more briefly and only while new eps were airing—yet I think we were correct not to bud it off.

I do worry, a bit, that we voted Heroes off the island, and we look likely to vote Supernatural off the island, and then whatever strikes a chord next, and the island might just get down to a couple of people and a machete. Which would be sad.

OTOH, it sounds like a lot of SF TV is in the pipeline for fall; and Supernatural does have a 3rd season (which lack thereof, last spring, was the #1 reason not to have its own thread); and solving traffic problems is always a good idea.

Just -- next time this comes up, we all have to remember that 300 posts in a week in Boxed Set is not appreciably more than is normal. (cf. those statistics I did on March 1.) A lively Boxed Set is a good thing; and I'm willing to agree that a lively Boxed Set is best when it's a lively, diverse Boxed Set.


Lee - Jul 16, 2007 5:36:47 pm PDT #7170 of 10289
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

I missed something I need to go look at.


sumi - Jul 16, 2007 5:40:17 pm PDT #7171 of 10289
Art Crawl!!!

How did we do it when Buffy and Angel were on back to back?

I was disgruntled about the w+ps disrupting conversation about a live show but at the same time, I wouldn't want live discussion of SPN to be separate from later discussion. I agree that would stifle things.

I love SPN. I've been watching it since the first episode. I don't understand why it can't have it's own thread. We all know that the VM thread is going away, right? Not that one thing has to leave to make room for another (so far as I understand things) but I don't think that giving it it's own thread could possibly make it busier.

On the other hand, we could try to make it easier to signpost live discussion of shows in Boxed Set. That way the giant time differences between airings of shows vs. ahemming of shows would matter less to those of us who ahem.


DXMachina - Jul 16, 2007 5:41:36 pm PDT #7172 of 10289
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

How did we do it when Buffy and Angel were on back to back?

Separate threads. :)


Liese S. - Jul 16, 2007 5:42:16 pm PDT #7173 of 10289
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."

Plus Spike for squee.


Katie M - Jul 16, 2007 5:42:29 pm PDT #7174 of 10289
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies

How did we do it when Buffy and Angel were on back to back?

Well, we had separate threads, right? Once we were here and having Serious Discussions we did, anyway; I honestly don't remember about the TT days.


sumi - Jul 16, 2007 5:45:21 pm PDT #7175 of 10289
Art Crawl!!!

I think that there were Angel threads in TT. . . also the SB thread started there and so did Natter. And Other Media.


Jon B. - Jul 16, 2007 5:48:52 pm PDT #7176 of 10289
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

Particularly if this level of interest and discussion wanes in a couple of months.

In a couple of months, there will be NEW episodes airing. I can't imagine the volume of discussion waxing. If anything, it will grow.

For example, Battlestar Galactica discussion was similarly dominant in the thread at one point—though perhaps more briefly and only while new eps were airing—yet I think we were correct not to bud it off.

Exactly. It was brief, it only happened while new episodes were airing and (from my perception as someone who doesn't watch either show) it still didn't approach the volume SPN has had. This seems to me an argument for a separate SPN thread.