Uh, are we gonna fight, or is there just gonna be a monster sarcasm rally?

Stoner Vamp ,'Lessons'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


§ ita § - Mar 01, 2007 11:20:19 am PST #6408 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Everything got all meta and now I'm dizzy.

Reasons for wanting a Heroes thread:

  • It's not mediafannish like the other Boxed Set shows
  • It overwhelms the thread for people who don't watch it
  • There are spoiler issues for people who're up to speed on that and not the other BS shows
  • The discussion is hampered by being in BS

Now, I'm not sure all of those have actually been posited, and I'm not claiming it's complete. But I've really lost track with all these restreaming ideas flitting back and forth. I want to get back to the start of the issue.


Aims - Mar 01, 2007 11:21:46 am PST #6409 of 10289
Shit's all sorts of different now.

The discussion is hampered by being in BS

My eyes completely skipped over "in".


Nutty - Mar 01, 2007 11:24:28 am PST #6410 of 10289
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

Reasons for wanting a Heroes thread:

I think Theo's original reasoning was just #2, and I've seen #1 and #3 added in since Light Bulbs opened.

The discussion is hampered by being in Boxed Set

I'm not sure I've seen this, and I'm not sure I understand it?


Ailleann - Mar 01, 2007 11:30:29 am PST #6411 of 10289
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda

Nutty, I think it means that some people don't go into BS to talk about X show, because they're behind on Y show and don't want to be spoiled.


§ ita § - Mar 01, 2007 11:30:54 am PST #6412 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'm not sure I've seen this, and I'm not sure I understand it?

If you haven't seen it, don't sweat it. I was just trying to be symmetrical. I'm pretty sure I saw the proposition that more/better discussion would happen in its own thread, but I'll be damned if I could Nilly it.

Is anyone willing to step up and provide cites for #2? Hec said even the anti-proliferationistas have generally agreed it's true, and I don't.


Zenkitty - Mar 01, 2007 11:45:26 am PST #6413 of 10289
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

I'd call Dresden Files mediafannish, but maybe it doesn't matter.

The tagging idea sounded like the best solution, to me, if it could be done.


amych - Mar 01, 2007 11:46:57 am PST #6414 of 10289
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

My eyes completely skipped over "in".

Mine too, but it's not like that's ever stopped us -- or even made the discussion any less fun!

I haven't seen reason #4 either.

#3 wasn't mentioned in the original proposal, but it's something I've seen people talk about a lot, not only in this discussion, but in Natter, Bitches, sites that are not this one. And it's a big concern for me, because I don't just see muttering about "so many messages, so little time", but also "I want to discuss show A, but I can't because of the spoilage for show B". And (as Maria (I think?) described way more eloquently than I can at the end of a grindingly slow work day with the zombie death flu) that means not only waiting for the DVD's to discuss B, which we've learned to work around in various ways, but losing the chance at what you currently want to say about A. But I'm still banging my head against whether there's a right balance between the fact that the current BS thread is simply too big for a lot of people and the fact that no proposed split is going to feel right in that same organic BS way.

OTOH, I'm quite uncomfortable with mediafannishness as a reason for anything. As an observation, a fun game, a part of the culture, a subtext-within-a-subtext, sure, bring it. As a piece of what-goes-where, it gets my hackles up because I don't see how we do that without getting into approved shows and My Fannish Is More Fannish Than Your Fannish And Mom Likes Me Better Anyway; then again, this may be because my definition of fannish has always been more like KateP's meta-heavy researchy obsessiveness than Nutty and Vonnie's squee-based definition, and I'm feeling a little defensive about how I can too identify that way even if I'm not into the pretty adolescent boys.

I think the current BS BS consensus is actually a good measure of Buffista-fannishness. And it's not the same set of activities or discussions that happen everywhere else -- but so what? Those are the shows that make us start babbling. I've never found Heroes discussion to be out of place in BS, just, well, voluminous.

And yes, I'm deliberately abusing the BS misread. And probably x-posting to the skies, given how long it's taken to type this.


§ ita § - Mar 01, 2007 11:48:04 am PST #6415 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I don't like the tagging idea, and not just because it requires a fair amount of design and coding, and therefore wouldn't be a near future thing, but because it's relying on me to remember to tag a post of mine. Threadsuck the current BS thread, and mentally tag the posts. I can't see it catching on and being accurate. Work all round.


Zenkitty - Mar 01, 2007 11:50:59 am PST #6416 of 10289
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Ah. I figured it would be more difficult than it sounded.


Topic!Cindy - Mar 01, 2007 11:51:24 am PST #6417 of 10289
What is even happening?

ita, see Plei: P.M. Marcontell "Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!" Feb 28, 2007 1:46:19 pm PST

amych: amych "Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!" Feb 28, 2007 1:59:38 pm PST. She is not in favor of a Heroes thread, but her fine print at the bottom implies she wouldn't be sorry to see it out of Boxed Set.

Somewhere there after Kristin, Maria (and someone before them) talked about having to skip around in BS, to avoid being spoiled for Heroes, which she can't watch now, but will watch eventually.