I'm back.
Do we have final wording?
We also need a vote counter, which I'll be if no one else steps up.
Simon: Captain's a good fighter, he must know how to handle a sword. Zoe: I think he knows which end to hold.
'Shindig'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
Jon B. - Aug 29, 2005 4:57:01 pm PDT #5969 of 10289
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
Lee - Aug 29, 2005 4:58:50 pm PDT #5970 of 10289
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
I'll do the counting,
§ ita § - Aug 29, 2005 5:00:53 pm PDT #5971 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Profile address, Perk?
Lee - Aug 29, 2005 5:07:21 pm PDT #5972 of 10289
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.
sure, that works.
§ ita § - Aug 29, 2005 5:15:11 pm PDT #5973 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Redirect complete.
Jon B. - Aug 30, 2005 2:55:52 am PDT #5974 of 10289
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
Still awaiting final wording.
I think the ballot needs to state that people are voting on the possibility of one thread. If most want a new thread at all, a runoff of the top 4 options across both questions will start after the first vote is counted.
I think that if we do a runoff, the runoff needs to have the option of no new thread.
I am very concerned that the structure of the vote (with all the different options) will allow for a thread to be created that a majority (over 50%) of the voters do not want. I do not think this would be a Good Thing, but YGTMV.
le nubian - Aug 30, 2005 3:04:19 am PDT #5975 of 10289
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."
yep. I agree.
Okay, let me just cut and paste what Cindy did above.
le nubian - Aug 30, 2005 3:06:19 am PDT #5976 of 10289
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."
1. Should we have a new thread that covers Fall TV (covering new series that debut in September or October)?
a. No
b. Yes, with no whitefont at all. ever.
c. Whitefont (with show title in black font) for 7 days. Then fade to black.
d. Whitefont (with show title in black font) current season discussion.
e. Whitefont (with show title in black font) all the time.
f. Yes. I'm indifferent to whitefont rules.
g. No Opinion.
2. Should we have a new Natter TV thread (covering all tv series - new and continuing that aren't covered in separate threads)?
a. No
b. Yes, with no whitefont at all. ever.
c. Whitefont (with show title in black font) for 7 days. Then fade to black.
d. Whitefont (with show title in black font) current season discussion.
e. Whitefont (with show title in black font) all the time.
f. Yes. I'm indifferent to whitefont rules.
g. No Opinion.
There will be a runoff ballot of the various options above.
le nubian - Aug 30, 2005 3:09:23 am PDT #5977 of 10289
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."
Okay, I added an option to include those who want the thread, but couldn't care less about whitefont rules. I might be the only one who fits in this category.
Topic!Cindy - Aug 30, 2005 4:18:05 am PDT #5978 of 10289
What is even happening?
I think adding that option has the potential to further fracture the vote, le nubian. Part of the issue is that our voting isn't just structured so that the option with the most votes wins; an option has to get a simple majority (50% of the votes + 1 more vote) to win.