And the filtering idea does skeeve me. It feels like it turns the thread from a place of two-way interaction into a place of one-way interaction. Or one-and-a-half-way.
I need Liese.
I couldn't believe it the first twenty times you told us, but it's starting to sink in now.
Riley ,'Lessons'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
Dana - Aug 25, 2005 4:11:34 pm PDT #5895 of 10289
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
Eddie - Aug 25, 2005 4:19:52 pm PDT #5896 of 10289
Your tag here.
And the filtering idea does skeeve me. It feels like it turns the thread from a place of two-way interaction into a place of one-way interaction. Or one-and-a-half-way.
It shouldn't. Essentially you're just creating virtual threads and the functionality would be no different than "real" threads.
brenda m - Aug 25, 2005 4:22:03 pm PDT #5897 of 10289
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
I'm with Dana.
Eddie - Aug 25, 2005 4:22:06 pm PDT #5898 of 10289
Your tag here.
Okay. Here's the list: [link] I think they discuss what's what in BBaBB.
Well, we're getting ahead of ourselves (and OT). If TPTB want to interview me for the job, I think BBaBB would be the place to do it. I guess I'll volunteer over there and we'll proceed accordingly.
le nubian - Aug 25, 2005 4:24:55 pm PDT #5899 of 10289
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."
I'm not such a fan of filtering.
Okay...so I'm reading through the discussion regarding a Fall TV/TV thread and I'm not sure how to summarize what I've read. Let me attempt it in search of other comments:
1) People interested in a TV Natter thread generally
2) People interested in just a Fall TV thread (which would cover debuts from this month, Sept and October
3) People not interested in either because it would be too many shows slammed in one thread.
Does this represent all expressed views so far?
Continuing on...if we had a "Fall TV" thread, what would people want to discuss in the thread? Exclusions? How long-lived would this thread be?
Would we want to have a 2nd season Winter TV thread as well?
Dana - Aug 25, 2005 4:26:43 pm PDT #5900 of 10289
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
It shouldn't. Essentially you're just creating virtual threads and the functionality would be no different than "real" threads.
Well, the thing with skeeving is that it just sort of happens. And I like the way the thread is now. I don't want it to change. I acknowledge that it doesn't work for some people, but it does work for some people. And I am those people. People who need people.
Kat - Aug 25, 2005 4:29:25 pm PDT #5901 of 10289
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
Dana, I agree that it's not a great solution and not something I'd want to see. But, I figured it was also easier to point out the tech end objections.
I think assuming that I will be self filtering in a thread where X number of shows (and let's say we'll be generous and say 10 shows) are being discussed is also unwieldy. It means that west coasters could never participate because if an 8:00 show airs and the discussion is happening, and if I get it here in LA at 8:00 and want to talk about it, I can't because there may be posts about shows for which I don't want to be spoiled that have already aired in NYC at 10:00, but which I haven't watched. Ditto at 10:00 here if the east coasters are talking about, I dunno, the Daily Show.
Essentially it's a thread people who are timewise behind the east coast could never participate in. This isn't even talking about tape delay or tivo delay.
Moreover, If each of those shows generates 10 posts a day (which is possible) that's still a lot of posts. Not including the WNP or the other high post count days on day of airing. So I'm not sure how this is less traffic (and if you don't watch all 10 shows) less noise than anywhere else where shows are being discussed.
JenP - Aug 25, 2005 4:39:38 pm PDT #5902 of 10289
I'm one of those people, too, Dana. For whom it works. The filtering for myself. I like it as is.
So, after a show gets a second season what happens? Talk goes in Natter? Because not every show will generate enough interest for its own thread. And that defeats at least one of the reasons that (I think) supporters want a TV thread - not having to mine Natter for discussion.
Example: I'm used to talking BSG with people in Boxed Set. If it had been in a Fall TV thread last year (or, well, January. Whatever.), then where would I be going to talk about it now (assuming that it didn't have a home in Boxed Set, naturally)? Natter? Because that would be frustrating, probably - been used to it one way, now a whole different thread and a whole different whitefont rule.
Unless I'm misunderstanding that part - the threads in the proposal are for New TV, right?
Jessica - Aug 25, 2005 4:39:57 pm PDT #5903 of 10289
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
The filtering idea skeeves me no end. If people want that kind of interaction, set up a Livejournal community. This is a discussion board.
Cass - Aug 25, 2005 4:43:57 pm PDT #5904 of 10289
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.
The filtering idea skeeves me no end. If people want that kind of interaction, set up a Livejournal community. This is a discussion board.While I was still trying to sort out why I felt the skeeve, Jess sums it up for me.
I'm still not sure how I feel about a new thread. I'm not really rah-rah for proliferation but I can see a potential place for new tv discussions.
But the filter skeeves me, especially at b.org.