I am just throwing this out there, but if you don't like 6, vote NO. Only if you do like 6, vote YES.
Reynolds, I'm a dangerous-minded man on a ship loaded with hurt. Now, why you got me chatting with your peons?
Womack ,'The Message'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
msbelle - Mar 25, 2003 3:15:45 pm PST #580 of 10289
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
Cindy - Mar 25, 2003 3:21:24 pm PST #581 of 10289
Nobody
what msbelle said.
I'm wondering, though. Just because I think 4 would be a great number (hypothetically), I'll probably vote yes on six because it's close enough for me to support and get a decision made. But shouldn't my 4 be counted in the opinion survey if six doesn't end up passing?
It's just a survey. If six doesn't pass, there'll be more discussion, and those who voted six, but like other numbers better can say so at the time.
msbelle - Mar 25, 2003 3:23:08 pm PST #582 of 10289
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
and we are breathing.......everybody breathe in and raise the arms.......and exhale and bring the arms down.
Gus - Mar 25, 2003 3:32:19 pm PST #583 of 10289
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.
and we are breathing.......everybody breathe in and raise the arms.......and exhale and bring the arms down.
msbelle rocketh.
Cindy - Mar 25, 2003 3:39:21 pm PST #584 of 10289
Nobody
I'm very much breathing. Also calm. I sounded harsh didn't I? I didn't mean to, at all. In fact, I was going for the opposite. I'm sorry. Very sorry.
I edited out the parts in that prior post that sounded un-breathing, because I really didn't mean them to.
brenda m - Mar 25, 2003 3:41:35 pm PST #585 of 10289
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
Not a problem, I was just wondering about why we decided to limit it.
Because frankly, even if the number were 2, 9, or 11, I'd probably be voting yes in the hope of getting through this one.
But I'm happy with it as it stands if that's what the decision was.
Java cat - Mar 25, 2003 3:41:47 pm PST #586 of 10289
Not javachik
I printed and got caught up last night and have 5 mins. left on my lunch break. I trotted here to advocate for 4, because there was a request backthread asking 3 and 4s to come on it and advocate away. But there're ~125 more messages that I just scanned/don't really have time to read; and we've gone from 3, 4 and 6 on the table to having only 6 on the table? And you're posting it tonight?
Jesse - Mar 25, 2003 3:42:19 pm PST #587 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Yes. If 6 does not work for you, vote no.
Java cat - Mar 25, 2003 3:51:01 pm PST #588 of 10289
Not javachik
Okay. VOTE NO against 6.
The Phoenix started about 6 months ago. Think about how much discussion has gone on in 6 months. That's a long time to have something banned from being brought up.
Natter 6 started Dec. 28. Today is March 25 and we're on Natter 10. 4 full Natter threads (almost) = 3 months.
I think that 3 months is too little time, and 6 too much.
Four would mean that instead of twice a year, items can be looked at again three times a year. Four = about 6.5 Natter threads. And that's about right.
VOTE NO on 6.
Burrell - Mar 25, 2003 3:54:29 pm PST #589 of 10289
Why did Darth Vader cross the road? To get to the Dark Side!
The Phoenix started about 6 months ago. Think about how much discussion has gone on in 6 months.
Every time someone says this it reaffirms my thought that 6 months isn't that long. YMMV