Okay. VOTE NO against 6.
The Phoenix started about 6 months ago. Think about how much discussion has gone on in 6 months. That's a long time to have something banned from being brought up.
Natter 6 started Dec. 28. Today is March 25 and we're on Natter 10. 4 full Natter threads (almost) = 3 months.
I think that 3 months is too little time, and 6 too much.
Four would mean that instead of twice a year, items can be looked at again three times a year. Four = about 6.5 Natter threads. And that's about right.
VOTE NO on 6.
The Phoenix started about 6 months ago. Think about how much discussion has gone on in 6 months.
Every time someone says this it reaffirms my thought that 6 months isn't that long. YMMV
Java - If you vote yes, you're also agreeing that we'll revisit in three months to take a vote of confidence on this decision (only), to see if we think 6 months is too long, too short, or just right.
The ballot is ready to go. Usual place.
Let me know if you want any language changed, Sophia.
So, do we count early votes, or do we make people vote again?
(As long as nothing changes in the ballot, I'd say keep them.)
From this ballt Jesse? I would say keep them unless the person votes twice.
Should we close this thread becuase voting has started?
