Anya ,'Dirty Girls'
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
Owning up in tag or profile addresses that nicely.
Yeah, I'd be fine with that information in the profile as a compromise solution.
I don't really have the in-joke annoyance seem people have with it. I'm more with the OCD reflex wanting an exact match between users and IDs. So the more it proliferates the more it bugs. New pseuds for every line of jokery? Don't like that. Occasional pseuds for rare recurring situations like...paperdol's need for personal anonymity or Ferret jokes? I don't mind.
A pun killed my uncle.
Well, by the rules of the board, it A) isn't consistent, because it isn't even the same people doing it and 2) until the board legislates against it, or it contravenes the "demon-like" behaviour definition in a way that supercedes "annoys *me* some", in the area of personal attacks and other activity that gets people banned, then it isn't either consistent or demon-like.
By your personal interpretation of the rules of the board. Mine differ. Which is why we have this thread.
"Consistent" is a tricky one because of the nature of a sockpuppet -- it could be the same person with 15 logins, or it could be 15 different people.
But rudeness has fallen under "demonlike" since Table Talk, and I don't think it's remotely a stretch to call sockpuppetry rude behavior. In a board culture that has traditionally valued real-world identity as much as this one has, using a sockpuppet to talk to people (or, more frequently, at people) just for kicks, is rude behavior.
A pun killed my uncle.
Humor can be relatively dangerous.
As one of the sockpuppet-grumpy people, I'd be satisfied if people put their real names in the profile. One of my major freakouts about sockpuppets is not knowing if this is a new person or somebody I already know.
What I'm hearing is that sockpuppets amuse more people than they annoy; that being the case, I can settle for having the sockpuppets fess up.
I don't really have the in-joke annoyance seem people have with it.
Yeah. Not getting any joke is annoying, whether it's a jokey sockpuppet, or the one about the Goa'uld, the Jaffa, and the Tok'ra.
or the one about the Goa'uld, the Jaffa, and the Tok'ra.
Is that the one that takes place at the apostrophe warehouse?
Any way we can consense the profile thing rather than making it a hard and fast LAW? That way we won't have to legislate things like the Allyson Exception.
I like the profile solution.
I don't think it's remotely a stretch to call sockpuppetry rude behavior
It certainly is to the people that think it is funny, or even those who are willing to tolerate it.
In a board culture that has traditionally valued real-world identity as much as this one has, using a sockpuppet to talk to people (or, more frequently, at people) just for kicks, is rude behavior.
To be evaluated and appealed as "demon-like" on a case-by-case basis.