It doesn't seem like an issue of expression to me, but one of citizenship. Who you are on this board is your passport and your currency. What you say and how it's attached to your name are central to whatever existence you have here. That's not about legislating humor. It's about something integral to how the board works.

It doesn't seem like an issue of expression to me, but one of citizenship. Who you are on this board is your passport and your currency. What you say and how it's attached to your name are central to whatever existence you have here. That's not about legislating humor. It's about something integral to how the board works

Owning up in tag or profile addresses that nicely.

What you say and how it's attached to your name are central to whatever existence you have here

I understand this concept completely and agree, but I don't think it goes against an occasional sock puppet. Judge the SP by the SP, if March is annoying, ask March to stop. I can cope with loving Trudy and thinking March was a bit over-the-top (though amusing, in a Dada-ist way).

Occasionally you just have to pull out the polka dot tie and the propeller beanie.

edit: and hte proposal of a true ID in the profile is a very good work-around. Any SP who doesn't do this we know is not following hte rules.

Is sockpuppetry consistent demon-like behaviour? Clearly not.

The only sockpuppetry I've ever seen on this board that I think ever fit that description was Anathema/Mieskie, and we dealt with it. All the sockpuppetry I've seen lately has been attempts at humor. They seem to work for some people, and not for others, but certainly don't fit my description of demon-like. What's next, puns? A lot of people don't like them, either. Is participating in a pun fest demon-like behavior to the people who don't like them?

Owning up in tag or profile addresses that nicely.

Yeah, I'd be fine with that information in the profile as a compromise solution.

I don't really have the in-joke annoyance seem people have with it. I'm more with the OCD reflex wanting an exact match between users and IDs. So the more it proliferates the more it bugs. New pseuds for every line of jokery? Don't like that. Occasional pseuds for rare recurring situations like...paperdol's need for personal anonymity or Ferret jokes? I don't mind.

A pun killed my uncle.

Well, by the rules of the board, it A) isn't consistent, because it isn't even the same people doing it and 2) until the board legislates against it, or it contravenes the "demon-like" behaviour definition in a way that supercedes "annoys *me* some", in the area of personal attacks and other activity that gets people banned, then it isn't either consistent or demon-like.

By your personal interpretation of the rules of the board. Mine differ. Which is why we have this thread.

"Consistent" is a tricky one because of the nature of a sockpuppet -- it could be the same person with 15 logins, or it could be 15 different people.

But rudeness has fallen under "demonlike" since Table Talk, and I don't think it's remotely a stretch to call sockpuppetry rude behavior. In a board culture that has traditionally valued real-world identity as much as this one has, using a sockpuppet to talk to people (or, more frequently, at people) just for kicks, is rude behavior.

A pun killed my uncle.

Humor can be relatively dangerous.

As one of the sockpuppet-grumpy people, I'd be satisfied if people put their real names in the profile. One of my major freakouts about sockpuppets is not knowing if this is a new person or somebody I already know.

What I'm hearing is that sockpuppets amuse more people than they annoy; that being the case, I can settle for having the sockpuppets fess up.

I don't really have the in-joke annoyance seem people have with it.

Yeah. Not getting any joke is annoying, whether it's a jokey sockpuppet, or the one about the Goa'uld, the Jaffa, and the Tok'ra.