Hey, I've been in a firefight before! Well, I was in a fire. Actually, I was fired from a fry-cook opportunity. I can handle myself.

Wash ,'War Stories'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


juliana - Apr 13, 2005 1:52:49 pm PDT #5249 of 10289
I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I miss them all tonight…

Y'know....

Sockpuppets, as a rule, have bothered me since day 1 of being on the 'Net. It looks like I'm not the only person who feels this way, and so I appreciate the fact that there is a discussion on it. And right now, that's all it seems to be to me - a discussion of the concept and people's feelings surrounding it. We're not refining the proposal for a vote, we're just discussing the larger issue.

Maybe I'm typing to hear myself type. But I feel that this is more valuable than a conversation getting shut down because someone walks away or says, "OMG that could offend someone else". People got bugged, they spoke up, other people agreed or disagreed, and we're talking about it.

I know some people miss the freewheeling. However, it's really hard to freewheel when a decent chunk of people are gritting their teeth and not saying anything.

You see, this is why I don't post that much. I'm not coherent even to myself.


Sean K - Apr 13, 2005 1:55:50 pm PDT #5250 of 10289
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

Poor Sean, dreaming of the days of liberty and justice for all. Power to the people, brother.

What can I say, I'm a misty-eyed idealist.


Lyra Jane - Apr 13, 2005 1:56:28 pm PDT #5251 of 10289
Up with the sun

Getting annoyed about sockpuppets to the point of forcing debates and votes strikes me as the most trivial use of post time I can imagine.

I disagree. I wouldn't have put a proposal on the table myself, but I think this is certainly worth a formal discussion. We're an Internet forum. We aren't going to vote on how to cure cancer. Policy changes are by definition lightbulb-worthy.

I also trust that as a community we'd deal with one as we'd deal with any truly nasty poster.

True, but ... why leave the door open for that? It seems to me that banning sockpuppets prevents the possibility of abuse and hurts exactly no one, since you could still roleplay in Sang Sacre or on another forum if it makes you happy. Given our talky meat tendencies, I don't think we're in danger of legislating against lower-case logins, or whatever.

Clovis, Ferrets, Zombies, and God have been here as long as I have. I think this IS part of our community vibe.

I feel like one or two posts every blue moon from a sockpuppet whose "real" identity is easily sussed out creates a different vibe than having a new sockpuppet every other week.

So does that mean that, if this passes, I need to pick a single user name and then, probably, limit what threads I post in?

Kristen, if I were God of the board (so very not, obviously) I would exempt pseuds that were used for privacy reasons and fairly obviously linked. But I don't know how to write the proposal that way.

ION, the word sockpuppet is starting to look funny.


Wolfram - Apr 13, 2005 1:56:44 pm PDT #5252 of 10289
Visilurking

One thing I find annoying about SPs, is it seems to me to foster that whole elite thing we typically eschew (cool kids and all.) The folks who make sock puppets are always the old timers who were around before this board, and I don't think it would work as well if everybody started doing it.

We all make jokes and enjoy being COMMed. But do you really think SPs would be fun if everybody started using them all the time?


Connie Neil - Apr 13, 2005 1:58:45 pm PDT #5253 of 10289
brillig

But do you really think SPs would be fun if everybody started using them all the time?

Depends on how funny the posts are.


NoiseDesign - Apr 13, 2005 1:59:24 pm PDT #5254 of 10289
Our wings are not tired

I feel like one or two posts every blue moon from a sockpuppet whose "real" identity is easily sussed out creates a different vibe than having a new sockpuppet every other week.

This was made in reference to Clovis, Ferrets, and Zombies.

I don't know who any of the controllers of there are. I thought I did at one point, but I found out much later that I was wrong. Still find them funny. Knowing the identity isn't so much an issue for me.


msbelle - Apr 13, 2005 1:59:35 pm PDT #5255 of 10289
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

Poor Sean, dreaming of the days of liberty and justice for all. Power to the people, brother.

honestly, bringing something up is not squashing your freedoms. or wait, are you being funny?

We don't like sockpuppets = we're oversensitive.

imo, suggesting that this discussion or even the implementation of Betsy's proposal word for word would strip anyone of "liberty and justice" = complete overreaction.

it's a freaking online community board, not the halls of justice in some crunchy universe.

damn the man, and all that. wait a minute - it is comical.


Wolfram - Apr 13, 2005 2:00:28 pm PDT #5256 of 10289
Visilurking

What makes a universe crunchy?


Sean K - Apr 13, 2005 2:00:58 pm PDT #5257 of 10289
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

I think this is a very valuable discussion to have. This may wind up being one of the healthier discussions we've had. It could also end up being the worst. Time will tell.

And I get that a fair number of people are really upset by sockpuppets, and I think that's legitimate.

I just have grave doubts that an offical policy against them is the best answer.

And no, I still don't have a better suggestion.


NoiseDesign - Apr 13, 2005 2:01:32 pm PDT #5258 of 10289
Our wings are not tired

What makes a universe crunchy?

Snap, Crackle, and Pop.