Maybe sock puppets should be required to have the tag: Hello! This is ____! I have created this persona for humorous purposes!
Then everybody wins
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
Maybe sock puppets should be required to have the tag: Hello! This is ____! I have created this persona for humorous purposes!
Then everybody wins
Sean, do you have an alternate solution? How would you handle the recurring discontent?
Remember -- NOTHING has to be voted on. This could just be nothing but a discussion.
I would just like to then take this opportunity to say that I am a HUGE Betsy fan, and I hope my comment is not taken personally. It's not meant that way.
b) makes b.org feel like somewhere else. And not in a nice somewhere else place.
Can you elaborate on this? In what way?
Thanks, Sean. I can be just as wrongheaded as any other Buffista, and this may well be one of those cases.
Are we the United States Congress now?
I don't understand the point the Distinguished Gentleman from California is making.
I'm not sure the whole proposal vote thing is absolutely necessary, but it can't hurt.
To reply to some stuff from Bureau:
Meaning that a sockpuppet poster knows who they really are and we don't?
Yes. I feel like the sockpuppeteer and whoever else is in on the secret is, basically, fucking with us for fun, and it bugs. A lot.
I didn't know who they were (still don't know who March was), but they weren't being mean to anyone, IIRC
You didn't think March's fixation on Kristin was kind of creepy? Clearly, in that case Kristin was okay with the joke. But if she hadn't been, it would have been pretty close to Internet stalker territory, what with the tagline about "blood of a tweedy one" and all.
The thing that scares me is that someday, there will be a March who *won't* be an innocent in joke. And I really don't want to have a precedent that says we're okay with sockpuppetry.
(And I've been told that March was also Trudy, but I obviously don't know for sure.)
I'm not anti-SP per se. I'll admit it can be annoying--but I usually only get annoyed when I can't figure out who it is.
I don't think I'd support a no-SP rule (with a SS exception) because I've seen sockpuppets lighten the mood when it really needed lightened.
But that doesn't mean that people who get annoyed by sockpuppets are humorless. If I get annoyed by something, I'd like to think I could speak up without gettting a tongue stuck out at me and without being called a humorless meanie.
Can you elaborate on this? In what way?
Similar to Betsy, I guess. I like talking to (or reading posts by) people. Sock puppets != people.
It's a very people-y place for me here, and the abstraction doesn't serve that sensation. But I'm here for that sensation. That's part of the the board's appeal.
Quoting myself:
Maybe sock puppets should be required to have the tag: Hello! This is ____! I have created this persona for humorous purposes!
Then everybody wins
I am not being snarky, btw. It's a nice compromisey solution.