By revote, you mean runoff? You should state that in the ballot. e.g., "If no one choice receives at least 50% of the vote, then we will have a runoff vote between the two options with the most votes."

Sure. I would suggest it, but I'd like to hear from the people who this thread most affects to see what the preference would be. I can amend the suggested ballot to reflect this but if people want more discussion, etc. that's okay with me too.

Too bad there's not a way to do that sort of thing instantly....

t runs away very fast

Instant discussion? That would be quite a feat.

Or are you, perhaps, referring to another goal of LeN's?

::blinks innocently::

[link]

::right behind brenda::

okay, I do not understand how that link is relevant to the current discussion. what am I missing?

Sorry, LeN. A way to instantly decide a run-off is the driving force behind certain voting schemes (as described in the link). There is a running joke on the board about people's reluctance to open that particular can of worms, again.

Do you mean (highlight at your own risk) preferential voting ?

There's something that's been bothering me about this vote, and I just need to get it off my chest. I'm trying to think of a way to say it without offending anyone, and without coming off as selfish and obnoxious, but I don't know if that's going to happen. So before I say anything - I understand that this is a community that cannot and should not have to accomodate everyone. And I further understand that I am only one individual in the community, and I currently speak only for myself. Others are free to agree or disagree at will. So here it is:

In the "old" days there were two threads for spoiler seekers - heavy and lite - which seemed to match up pretty well with the three kinds of spoiler seekers we had - the total spoiler prudes (who stayed in the show threads), the lite spoiler flirts, and the hard core spoiler sluts. (Hereinafter Prudes, Flirts, and Sluts.)

Then the great crunch came. And the spoiler lite threads were closed out of necessity. And some of us Flirts whimpered a bit, but accepted the necessity. And life went on.

Now resources are less taxed, and it looks like a spoiler lite thread may come back. But we Flirts are being asked to consider sharing that thread - with some Sluts. Why? Because the Sluts, who already have a general spoiler thread, don't want to have to whitefont everything for folks who want to be Sluts sometimes and Prudes at other times. So the proposed spoiler lite thread is being asked to accomodate Flirts and Sometime Sluts.

Well I feel that's unfair. Why should the Flirts have to share with Sometime Sluts? If anyone should be accomodating Sometime Sluts (if they indeed need an accomodation) it should really be the Sluts. But I feel like we Flirts are looking selfish because we don't want to share our thread with any Sluts. And it's almost a fait accompli that the Sluts thread cannot be shared with the Sometime Sluts and I want to know why that's a given. Aren't the Flirts being asked to do the same thing that the Sluts don't want to do (meticulous labeling and/or whitefonting)?

Now the ballot as written seems to have a slant towards making the Slut thread no whitefont, and making some kind of accomodation in the Flirt thread, simply because the Slut thread is already in existence and the Flirt thread isn't. That's what's bothering me.

I apologize again if I'm sounding like a broken record, or beating the "me, me, me" drum way too much. But I needed to get this out, and now feel free to discuss or disregard as necessary.

Wolf,

Doesn't the ballot as posted allow for a Lite only thread? I specifically took into account those who do not want heavy spoilers in the Lite thread by stating "no hard spoilers allowed" in the Lite option. If this isn't what you want, let me know and I'll reword.