My preference, whatever it's worth, would be:
Spoilers -- Open discussion, no whitefont (except possibly at the poster's discretion).
Spoilers Lite -- Episode titles, guest stars, writers not in whitefont; TV guide-esque tidbits in whitefont; anything harder linked to.
Why does one need to link to the writers, instead of including them in thread?
I thought I remembered the old lite including casting spoilers -- in fact, having been made for them.
And writers used to be whitefonted in the show threads, and openly discussed in all levels of spoils threads. I don't want to sound all "this is how we've always done it", but how lite is lite?
I thought I remembered the old lite including casting spoilers -- in fact, having been made for them.
That's how I remember it, too.
In fact, here's the thread header from the Lite Spoiler threads we had here:
[NAFDA] The place for casting and other vague spoilers, for those who merely want to wade, not drown, in the spoiler sea. Casting spoilers are okay, as are non-plot-point specific spoilers (like, "Joss says the theme of Season 7 is ____"). White-fonting is always appreciated. Information from Magazines like TV Guide may also come up.
In fact, here's the thread header from the Lite Spoiler threads we had here:
Glad I'm not, you know, insane. ('Twas the Torez Spoiler that kicked it off, yes?)
I plan to vote for a lite thread no matter how it's defined, because I've had the sense that it's been genuinely missed. But I'm being naggy about the definition because the whole reason I never participated in the old one was that I found it so tricky to figure out what could be discussed there (is this casting or plot? is it a major plot point or a leitmotiv?) that it never seemed (when I dropped in) to take off into discussion.
And because I'm just a little deeply resentful over the fact that the new spoilers thread I voted on was whitefont policy tbd and all of a sudden it was all whitefont all the time with no discussion that I can find anywhere.
Spoilers Lite -- Episode titles, guest stars, writers not in whitefont; TV guide-esque tidbits in whitefont; anything harder linked to.
LJ is me. I'm basically a spoiler prude, except when it comes to casting, and then I like to discuss it. I think that "negative casting" (folks leaving the show) should be whitefonted.
And because I'm just a little deeply resentful over the fact that the new spoilers thread I voted on was whitefont policy tbd and all of a sudden it was all whitefont all the time with no discussion that I can find anywhere.
The only reason I put the whitefont thing in the header for the new spoilers thread was to err on the side of caution until the final policy could be worked out. People had discussed both ways prior to the vote. I didn't mean for it to be set in stone.
George Steinbrenner
oops. Lemme try copying again, with the right command this time....
err on the side of caution
I kinda figured as much, actually -- but I brought the matter up over there because I didn't want it to get entrenched before we discussed it. I'm still not sure that something that was supposed to be TBD warrants lightbulbs, but since Lite got attached to the ballot and I'm pro-that, we're all good.
Sorry, I didn't meant to ask for the rationale about linking to writers -- I meant to actual spoilers.
Is the current thought that Spoilers Light is for people who don't want to be spoiled too much about a show, or for people who don't want to be spoiled about too many shows?