I hate to be elitist, but Minearverse moves too quickly for me. I would love to know what Tim is working on, without the kerfluffle of Wonderfalls discussion, etc. Bet it is scaring Tim too.
'Touched'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
So whatever we call the WF Spoilers thread, the title will be a Googleable set of search terms for getting there. The slug, nsm.
But if it's something definitely associated with Wonderfalls, but not something used a whole lot (and no, I have no idea what that would be -- maybe a seldom-quoted line or something), it would still be googlable. For example, we're the only thing that google finds for "corsets flaming otters."
Google "wonderfalls discussion" and we're on page 3, just from the slug.
Right, because people are linking to us like this: Wonderfalls Discussion. I don't *think* it actually matters that the search terms are on the page.
[eta: What I'm trying to get at is I don't think a sneaky title will actually hide us. If we get linked to by anyone as Wonderfalls spoilers, we're Googleable for those search terms.]
Thread Called Janet
Where we talk about the arc you didn't get to see. Please don't post asking for episodes. This is not the thread you're looking for.
For example, we're the only thing that google finds for "corsets flaming otters."
For some reason that makes me smile.
Maybe a title involving the "'sode" line?
Bet it is scaring Tim too.
I don't live in his head, I wouldn't presume to know,
I don't *think* it actually matters that the search terms are on the page.
It does. The linking like that matters too, but so does the actual page content. (When google gets a hit that's based solely on links, the little blurb beneath the link on the google page will have just the beginning of the page. When the text is in the page, that'll be excerpted and bolded.)
What Allyson said. Plus, he seems to be posting as often as ever...
(Which is kind of part of the problem, isn't it? Not him posting, but that when he posts he attracts a bunch more posts. We should steal his Internet connection. :-))
Here's a problem with "hiding" the thread -- can we actually come up with an obscure yet recognizable slug as well? Because that's googlable too
Title: A Too Brief 'Sode
Description on message center and main page: A thread to discuss all 13 sodes of that show that only ran for four, on FOX, on Fridays, and then a Thursday, in the slot where they are now rerunning the abomination
Description at the top of the thread: Discuss all 13 episodes of Wonderfalls here. (This one shouldn't be googlable, right, because it's inside the thread?)
Tim's one of us. Only cuter. It's a press problem.