Is hard with the tongue holding.
This, and I'm not even saying that based on having, you know, actually seen them.
(Also, plei, best email addy during work day?) t /hijack
We're in love. We're ... lovers. We're lesbian, gay-type lovers.
Willow ,'Potential'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
amych - Apr 09, 2004 8:53:10 am PDT #3806 of 10289
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?
Jesse - Apr 09, 2004 8:53:27 am PDT #3807 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Frank, I think Googlability is the issue.
P.M. Marc - Apr 09, 2004 8:55:20 am PDT #3808 of 10289
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
(Also, plei, best email addy during work day?)
Profile.
Frank, I think Googlability is the issue.
Do our thread names google? I guess they would, huh.
Jesse - Apr 09, 2004 8:57:16 am PDT #3809 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Do our thread names google? I guess they would, huh.
Freaky: If you google "Minearverse," we're not the first site that comes up. But they are talking about us.
tina f. - Apr 09, 2004 9:00:57 am PDT #3810 of 10289
Freaky: If you google "Minearverse," we're not the first site that comes up. But they are talking about us.
I just did the same thing. But if you google "Getting his words out" we don't come up at all and I went four pages in. And "YExpirationDateMV" gets no hits at all. Point being: it's the TM that is googleable - if we come up with something non-M it should be OK, I would think.
I am pro Wonderfalls spoiler thread.
Frankenbuddha - Apr 09, 2004 9:01:25 am PDT #3811 of 10289
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"
Frank, I think Googlability is the issue.
Not sure I follow. The Googlability is a bad thing, right? So wouldn't we want a more obscure name for the thread? on edit - OK, I get it now. smacks forhead
It also occurred to me that a spoiler thread is going to draw those seeking copies of the unaired episodes like a swarm of locusts. That's something to consider.
Lyra Jane - Apr 09, 2004 9:03:01 am PDT #3812 of 10289
Up with the sun
I am also pro-WF thread.
Jesse - Apr 09, 2004 9:03:09 am PDT #3813 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I think the idea is that we want the thread, but we really really don't want to come up when someone googles "wonderfalls spoilers."
tina f. - Apr 09, 2004 9:03:14 am PDT #3814 of 10289
It also occurred to me that a spoiler thread is going to draw those seeking copies of the unaired episodes like a swarm of locusts.
But that is already happening. I was about to say it can't get much worse and then ... well, that will mean it will, so. I'll just stick with the first sentence.
Lyra Jane - Apr 09, 2004 9:06:12 am PDT #3815 of 10289
Up with the sun
It also occurred to me that a spoiler thread is going to draw those seeking copies of the unaired episodes like a swarm of locusts.
That is why people want an obscure name, I think.
Could we have something about that in the thread header? E.g., Please do not post here looking for copies. Posts requesting copies will be edited or deleted.
(Or whatever --I'm not sure about the edit/deletia need.)