Eh, maybe. But what if someone today says "5. I like 5." does 5 go on the thing?
Nobody has. Somebody please draft a ballot so we can start nitpicking.
I know I'm a bad poet, but I'm a good man. All I ask is that... is that you try to see me—
William ,'Conversations with Dead People'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
Wolfram - Mar 24, 2003 10:48:38 am PST #348 of 10289
Visilurking
Wolfram - Mar 24, 2003 10:49:34 am PST #349 of 10289
Visilurking
Personally, I'd be happier with letting whatever got 34% win than with doing a runoff -- this is just not that important. But I know the People spoke against letting things win with less than 50%+.
IIRC, there was a vote.
Gus - Mar 24, 2003 10:51:01 am PST #350 of 10289
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.
Congratulations to all on the debate. At no time did anyone resort to hurling the epithet 'sixist'. Very civilized.
Jesse - Mar 24, 2003 10:51:08 am PST #351 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Discussion: NOW - 3/24/03 11:59 pm EST
Voting: 3/25/03 12 am EST - 3/28/03 12:00 am EST
PROPOSED BALLOT:
After a proposal, discussion and vote, further discussion on a given matter should be closed for:
3 months
4 months
6 months
No Preference
If no choice receives more than 50% of the votes, we will have a runoff between the top two vote-getters.
Note that this will apply to ALL decisions, affirmative and negative.
Sophia Brooks - Mar 24, 2003 10:53:32 am PST #352 of 10289
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
Jesse-- can you add "no preference" (Grrrr)? Also should we have some language that this applies to affirmative as well as negative votes?
Jesse - Mar 24, 2003 10:55:10 am PST #353 of 10289
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
Sure. I'll edit.
Wolfram - Mar 24, 2003 11:23:23 am PST #354 of 10289
Visilurking
Just out of curiousity, the no preference votes count towards the MVT, but not towards the percentage of votes for majority purposes. Right?
Dana - Mar 24, 2003 11:29:57 am PST #355 of 10289
"I'm useless alone." // "We're all useless alone. It's a good thing you're not alone."
Right.
Typo Boy - Mar 24, 2003 11:31:39 am PST #356 of 10289
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.
Wolfran - correct. And I agree with multi-ballot run-off rather than single ballot run-off at this time.
Jon B. - Mar 24, 2003 11:37:22 am PST #357 of 10289
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
Can we puhpuhpuhplllleeeeaaase have people put a second choice on this ballot? I've reread all the comments since I broached the topic yesterday, and I haven't seen a post from a single person that thought it was too complicated or didn't understand it. Cindy had one question which was quickly answered and Deena had trouble because she anthropomorphizes numbers. The only other complaints were meta ("we talk about it too much" and "other people think it's complicated"). I read a bunch of posts from people who were for it.