Simon: I, uh... I never-never shot anyone before. Book: I was there, son. I'm fair sure you haven't shot anyone yet.

'War Stories'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


Allyson - Jul 28, 2003 8:36:48 am PDT #2679 of 10289
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica

This is fucking insane.

Hey, same thing you were complaining about in Spoilers, re: calling the unspoiled insane.

But I do agree that if Jim so prefers, it can be added to the proposal, "If the Casting Change is added, so is added a Virgins thread." 'Course, the anti-thread proliferation party may take issue. But where we are closing some threads during the Great Housecleaning of The Fall 2003 TeeVee Season, perhaps we'll end up even stevens.


DavidS - Jul 28, 2003 8:37:24 am PDT #2680 of 10289
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I am reposting this from Bureau, from Scrappy. I am still unsure why this won't work, except for it wasn't the original proposal.

Personally, I'm against a compromise that ghettoizes each spoiler or unspoiler group into their own thread. I'm for accomodating the middle as much as possible and using the vote to find out what the middle is.

It'll dilute the discussion quite a bit and confuse the boards and create new threads to slice everything so fine. That's my issue.

Also, while that may be the compromise that may best resolve all issues, it is not the proposal at hand.


P.M. Marc - Jul 28, 2003 8:39:06 am PDT #2681 of 10289
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Personally, I'm against a compromise that ghettoizes each spoiler or unspoiler group into their own thread. I'm for accomodating the middle as much as possible and using the vote to find out what the middle is.

Word


Trudy Booth - Jul 28, 2003 8:42:57 am PDT #2682 of 10289
Greece's financial crisis threatens to take down all of Western civilization - a civilization they themselves founded. A rather tragic irony - which is something they also invented. - Jon Stewart

There isn't a middle if you want to watch the show without having any clue of what is going to happen.


justkim - Jul 28, 2003 8:44:05 am PDT #2683 of 10289
Another social casualty...

Maybe I'm way off base here, but I never got the impression that this wonderful board was designed to be all things for all people. I thought it was designed to be most things to most people. I don't want to see anyone ghettoized or made to feel left out, but I think that in trying to be all things to all people we will fracture ourselves more.

Sometimes people move out of a neighborhood. It happens. It's sad, but people all need to do what's best for themselves and their needs.

Note: The above is NOT, in anyway, directed at any one person or group of people.


DavidS - Jul 28, 2003 8:45:06 am PDT #2684 of 10289
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

There isn't a middle if you want to watch the show without having any clue of what is going to happen.

Again, we don't know what the outcome to this vote is yet.

If the summer-cast-change is allowed as non-spoily, then you may propose a new board for virgins. If you get the necessary seconds it will be go back to Lightbult for discussion and a vote.

This will all happen before the season begins.


amych - Jul 28, 2003 8:45:16 am PDT #2685 of 10289
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

It'll dilute the discussion quite a bit and confuse the boards and create new threads to slice everything so fine. That's my issue.

Agreed. I feel like we've lost a great deal of richness in natter by removing movies and music (note -- absolutely not proposing any change, just observing); we've seen that a bunch of people avoid the show threads altogether out of fear of treading on the spoiler policy we already have. The social effects of thread proliferation are much greater than the bandwidth cost. I hate to see this turn into one of those boards where there are a million separate threads and no good discussion.


DavidS - Jul 28, 2003 8:46:39 am PDT #2686 of 10289
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I don't want to see anyone ghettoized or made to feel left out, but I think that in trying to be all things to all people we will fracture ourselves more.

Exactly.

However, if the Virgins can make their case and muster the votes then we'll add a virgin board. I wouldn't prefer that and would expect that to be a very tiny tea party indeed. But if it gets voted in, so be it.


P.M. Marc - Jul 28, 2003 8:47:09 am PDT #2687 of 10289
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Maybe I'm way off base here, but I never got the impression that this wonderful board was designed to be all things for all people. I thought it was designed to be most things to most people.

Exactly this.


Nutty - Jul 28, 2003 8:50:06 am PDT #2688 of 10289
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

Personally, I'm against a compromise that ghettoizes each spoiler or unspoiler group into their own thread. I'm for accomodating the middle as much as possible and using the vote to find out what the middle is.

Concur with David.

I thought it was designed to be most things to most people.

I agree, justkim. (Can I call you Kim?) One of the reasons I'm eager for a vote is to find out where "most" lies. (I mean, I have my suspicions, but nobody will abide by my suspicions!