Lorne: Once the word spreads you beat up an innocent old man, well, the truly terrible will think twice before going toe-to-toe with our Avenging Angel. Spike: Yes. The geriatric community will be soiling their nappies when they hear you're on the case. Bravo.

'The Cautionary Tale of Numero Cinco'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


justkim - Jul 28, 2003 8:44:05 am PDT #2683 of 10289
Another social casualty...

Maybe I'm way off base here, but I never got the impression that this wonderful board was designed to be all things for all people. I thought it was designed to be most things to most people. I don't want to see anyone ghettoized or made to feel left out, but I think that in trying to be all things to all people we will fracture ourselves more.

Sometimes people move out of a neighborhood. It happens. It's sad, but people all need to do what's best for themselves and their needs.

Note: The above is NOT, in anyway, directed at any one person or group of people.


DavidS - Jul 28, 2003 8:45:06 am PDT #2684 of 10289
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

There isn't a middle if you want to watch the show without having any clue of what is going to happen.

Again, we don't know what the outcome to this vote is yet.

If the summer-cast-change is allowed as non-spoily, then you may propose a new board for virgins. If you get the necessary seconds it will be go back to Lightbult for discussion and a vote.

This will all happen before the season begins.


amych - Jul 28, 2003 8:45:16 am PDT #2685 of 10289
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

It'll dilute the discussion quite a bit and confuse the boards and create new threads to slice everything so fine. That's my issue.

Agreed. I feel like we've lost a great deal of richness in natter by removing movies and music (note -- absolutely not proposing any change, just observing); we've seen that a bunch of people avoid the show threads altogether out of fear of treading on the spoiler policy we already have. The social effects of thread proliferation are much greater than the bandwidth cost. I hate to see this turn into one of those boards where there are a million separate threads and no good discussion.


DavidS - Jul 28, 2003 8:46:39 am PDT #2686 of 10289
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I don't want to see anyone ghettoized or made to feel left out, but I think that in trying to be all things to all people we will fracture ourselves more.

Exactly.

However, if the Virgins can make their case and muster the votes then we'll add a virgin board. I wouldn't prefer that and would expect that to be a very tiny tea party indeed. But if it gets voted in, so be it.


P.M. Marc - Jul 28, 2003 8:47:09 am PDT #2687 of 10289
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

Maybe I'm way off base here, but I never got the impression that this wonderful board was designed to be all things for all people. I thought it was designed to be most things to most people.

Exactly this.


Nutty - Jul 28, 2003 8:50:06 am PDT #2688 of 10289
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

Personally, I'm against a compromise that ghettoizes each spoiler or unspoiler group into their own thread. I'm for accomodating the middle as much as possible and using the vote to find out what the middle is.

Concur with David.

I thought it was designed to be most things to most people.

I agree, justkim. (Can I call you Kim?) One of the reasons I'm eager for a vote is to find out where "most" lies. (I mean, I have my suspicions, but nobody will abide by my suspicions!


Megan E. - Jul 28, 2003 8:50:29 am PDT #2689 of 10289

If this discussion keeps up much longer, there won't be many people left on the board for this to be a issue.


Lyra Jane - Jul 28, 2003 8:58:06 am PDT #2690 of 10289
Up with the sun

Personally, I'm against a compromise that ghettoizes each spoiler or unspoiler group into their own thread. I'm for accomodating the middle as much as possible and using the vote to find out what the middle is.

It'll dilute the discussion quite a bit and confuse the boards and create new threads to slice everything so fine. That's my issue.

This is my problem, too. Spoilers and spoilage lite are for discussion of spoilers, pretty much. The Virgin Thread would be a *show* thread, and I think that would dilute discussion.

Also, if we create threads for other shows in the future, would we have to have spoiler-free versions of each of them? The proliferation and ghettoization issues implied by that bother even me.

There isn't a middle if you want to watch the show without having any clue of what is going to happen.

There's never been a thread for people in this situation. We've always discussed previews, which tell waaay more about the plot than knowing David Boreanaz will be back as Angel does.

I know there are people who don't even watch previews; I don't know how they read the board.

However, if the Virgins can make their case and muster the votes then we'll add a virgin board. I wouldn't prefer that and would expect that to be a very tiny tea party indeed. But if it gets voted in, so be it.

This is where I am, too.

(And I apologize for saying "take it to lightbulbs" and then disappearing. Meetings wait for no woman.)


Laura - Jul 28, 2003 9:02:12 am PDT #2691 of 10289
Our wings are not tired.

What Lyra Jane, David, Kim, Nutty, PMM, etc. have said. The more threads to discuss the show the less real discussion.

The question in my mind for this vote is whether or not summer casting announcements by TPTB are spoilers for this board.


Steph L. - Jul 28, 2003 9:02:24 am PDT #2692 of 10289
I look more rad than Lutheranism

I'd like to see any ballot create a thread for whichever community looses out.

Quite frankly, I'd rather see this voted on as a separate issue. I am not alone on this issue.

No, you're not alone. Clarifying the definition of spoilers is not the same as creating a thread. It should be 2 separate issues. Also, maybe there are people who would vote yes to one and no to the other. If you add a rider, that makes it impossible to have 2 different opinions.

There isn't a middle if you want to watch the show without having any clue of what is going to happen.

I think the point is, if you want to watch the show without having ANY clue of what is going to happen, you AREN'T in the "middle."