Spoilers, you mean? Or changes? I didn't think these issues had come up before.

I meant spoilers.

. Isn't the proposal limited to discussion of between-season casting spoilers that are being actively promoted by either the network or ME?

Which I think is a reasonable definition of "widely".

Except as I remember it has to be a "major" casting spoiler - which I dimly remember as as involving a regular (every episode) cast member being added or deleted.

Does someone wan't to repost the full-text with amendments that were accepted?

In which case, I personally know of 3 spoilers, only two of which, in my mind, would meet this criteria.

Oh, my god. I only know two. Are they the two that Burrell thinks meet the criteria and would be openly discussed if this proposal passes or is there another one that will be discussed that I don't know about.

See, this is the problem. And this is why we needed to have guidelines about when something is considered to be widely known and not a spoiler. Which is how we developed our current spoiler policy.

Huh. So how do we decide if Amy Acker's departure is promoted enough? Joss said it at Comic Con? Time Out NY mentioned it too?

Can I then talk about it in Bitches?

That's a very wobbly line.

The BCS? Very clear. Any others to which I may be privy? I have no idea and no idea how to find out.

Shouldn't part of the spoiler definition mean it will tell you something about the upcoming plot.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not with Sean on all casting spoilers. I get why people don't want to know them, even though they don't generally spoil things for me. I got a nice HSQ moment when Darla stood up pregnant at the end of the S3 opener, and when Angel went to see Faith at the end of the S2 opener.

But if someone is leaving the show, between the seasons, I still don't think it spoils anyone for anything that is going to happen on the show. The only specific thing it tells you is that they either will or will not address it, but it doesn't tell you how, if they do. Lookit Giles - he was missing for months and they were having him come back, and they still seldom addressed him missing anything, even Xander and Anya's wedding.

People are presuming that knowing about a departure or arrival tells them something about the plot. At the very worst, it tells them there may be something to speculate about. That's it.

ita, here's the proposal we're voting on:

"That major casting spoilers (to the main cast only, not recurring or guest), which are being advertised by Fox, the WB or ME in press advertising or their official website, are no longer spoilers, and should be discussed in the show threads. This includes cast additions or departures. The Main Cast are those characters who appear in the opening credits."

Huh, I'd thought there was an over-the-summer thing caveat, and there isn't. Interesting. So basically, as soon as Fox, the WB, or ME said either on their website or in press that Amy Acker was leaving, we could talk about it. So no on Comicon, yes on Time Out, as I read the proposal.

People are presuming that knowing about a departure or arrival tells them something about the plot. At the very worst, it tells them there may be something to speculate about. That's it.

"Giles isn't going to be in Sunnydale" is a plot point, though.

they still seldom addressed him missing anything, even Xander and Anya's wedding.

To be fair, they addressed this in the shooting script and t was cut for time. But I know what you mean.

I had the impression that "between seasons" was part of the proposal also. Just shows my memory is bad because it is not in any version I can find.

which are being advertised by Fox, the WB or ME in press advertising or their official website, are no longer spoilers,

Just to pick nits, you mind want to amend this to be a bit less specific: Change WB to "the network the show airs on" just in case, for example, Sci-Fi decides on the spur of the moment to start Firefly again, or Joss gets a new show on ESPN.

Katie - there should be a summer stipulation. Jim hasn't been here much since he made the proposal.

Jim - when come back...

Jim your proposal was worded as follows:

That major casting spoilers (to the main cast only, not recurring or guest), which are being advertised by Fox, the WB or ME in press advertising or their official website, are no longer spoilers, and should be discussed in the show threads. This includes cast additions or departures. The Main Cast are those characters who appear in the opening credits.

Jim, you will have the decision making power about the final wording of the proposal. I would like to suggest modifying it slightly to something like:

Major casting information, released during the NAFDA summer, regarding the addition to, or departure of actors from the cast of contracted regulars, which are being announced by the network, the studio, or the producers in press, advertising, or on their official websites, should no longer be considered spoilers, and should be open for discussion in NAFDA threads. Contracted regulars are those actors whose characters appear in the opening credits. This proposal should not affect other plot or casting spoiler rules. It does not lift the prohibition against NAFDA discussion of recurring character casting spoilers. It does not lift the prohibition on NAFDA discussion of an actor's change in status from contracted regular to recurring.

(I replaced FOX, the WB, and ME with network, studio and producers to vague it up for the future, in case someday, we're all devotees of show made and aired by other folks - unlikely, I know. )

Because I haven't seen any answer to my question on what we are protecting by having the rules limited to only allow the discussion of broadcast promo information, here's why I am voting for Jim's proposal (wording dependent - like if he says we have to send him all our money, I reserve the right to change my mind):

Most importantly, I think it's inevitable that this information will be allowed in NAFDA before the S5 premiere, so I don't understand the point of putting it off any longer, particularly in light of the fact that there have been official announcements of the cast.

Additionally, people are highly unlikely to get a HSQ moment from these contracted regular cast changes, because mostly likely, the network broadcast promos will reflect these cast changes, thus opening up the subject to NAFDA threads, before the show airs. The information has already been given in press releases, announced on the networks cast list page, and revealed by writers and producers in media interviews.

Even if the network doesn't produce new TV promos for the show, the opening title credits will show the names and images of those actors who are contracted regulars for a given season. Thus, the only likely HSQ moment we seem to be protecting isn't an HSQ moment at all, but rather an anti-climax. I understand some peope skip the credits, but that's neither here nor there where I'm concerned. We never restrict topic based on which parts of the broadcast hour someone skipped.

Finally, between season casting spoilers do not reveal any plot information. Anything is likely to happen, and it seems to me the season finale of the prior season gives much more of an indication to what we'll see in the coming season, than the addition or removal of some actors and characters.