Pretty cool except for the part where I was really terrified and now my knees are all dizzy.

Willow ,'Never Leave Me'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


Elena - Jul 25, 2003 9:08:01 am PDT #1911 of 10289
Thanks for all the fish.

I know this is an obvious question, but because this is the first I've heard of it, I'm asking anyhow. Did they reveal Lorne's decapitation before that episode aired?

Yes. They had pictures.


§ ita § - Jul 25, 2003 9:08:13 am PDT #1912 of 10289
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Did they reveal Lorne's decapitation before that episode aired?

They showed his head on a plate.

I'm being abstract because we're not voting to take the covers off this one elephant in this one room. If we tailor the discussion too tightly about this one thing, then we are just making an exception.

The language has to be solid, but not too specific.


Cindy - Jul 25, 2003 9:08:18 am PDT #1913 of 10289
Nobody

"It's on the website, in major city morning papers, TV Guide, and many web interviews with Joss" says inevitability, which is the only thing that leads me to a yes (but not in all threads).

It's on the wb website, as I used it, I believe I used as part of my point that I too think it's inevitable that this will be allowable in NAFDA before 1 minute of an episode airs. I think it's inevitable not only because it's all of those places, but because if they've posted an official announcement that Bubba is joining the cast and Lloyd is leaving the cast, that is going to be reflected in their (eventual) broadcast promos, which are already fair game.


Elena - Jul 25, 2003 9:10:46 am PDT #1914 of 10289
Thanks for all the fish.

Ok again - somethiing I can't prove but:

Gar, we really have no idea about the kind of percentages we're looking at here.

OK now I can't expect those opposed to the proposal to accept the above four premises.

Why should anyone accept them? Where is the basis in fact for them?

But I hope it is easy to see that support for it does follow from them, and that they are not obviously irrational or self-evidently wrong.

Um. Huh?


Cindy - Jul 25, 2003 9:11:03 am PDT #1915 of 10289
Nobody

2)A really tiny minority will be bothered by the passage of this proposal.

I think it's important to point out that in this instance, although hopefully not in future instances, even most of that really tiny minority is already spoiled.

I'm being abstract because we're not voting to take the covers off this one elephant in this one room. If we tailor the discussion too tightly about this one thing, then we are just making an exception.

Agreed, but we're still voting only on off-season changes to the regular contracted cast. Still, I agree with your principle, here.


Elena - Jul 25, 2003 9:14:55 am PDT #1916 of 10289
Thanks for all the fish.

I think it's important to point out that in this instance, although hopefully not in future instances, even most of that really tiny minority is already spoiled.

Really? If you're talking about this thread - yes, that's true. If you're talking about the board in general - do we really have any idea how many people know the information? Who knows what?


Sophia Brooks - Jul 25, 2003 9:20:45 am PDT #1917 of 10289
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

I just read through the post Season 5 discussion of SMG's return and it actually did seem to be an exception based on the inevitability of knowing and also because there seemed to be a conspiracy theory that Buffy dying was some weird Jossian Fuck You to the WB and the contract stuff was all false.

It was brought up and talked about with no objections that I could see, with the main thought being "Joss wants us to know this". I am not sure if this helps.

I also saw Burrell's first post!


Cindy - Jul 25, 2003 9:21:17 am PDT #1918 of 10289
Nobody

Elena, before I even comtemplate your last question, I'm still looking for an answer to this:

What value is there to forbidding printed and electronic between-season contracted-regulars casting promos, when we don't forbid televised between-season contracted-regulars casting promos?

I am right behind, in front of, next to you, in that plot spoilers (even if they're in the media or on the WB's site) should not be discussed in NAFDA - not even in white font. Ditto for casting spoilers during the season.

The reason I am not with you on the between-season, contracted-regulars casting promos, is because the WB will televise promos with the cast, and even if they don't, when the title credits run, who is and isn't a contracted regular will be made clear to everyone. People are not going to get their HSQ moment from credits, are they? And if so, if that's what we're protecting, I think it's frivolous.


Frankenbuddha - Jul 25, 2003 9:22:07 am PDT #1919 of 10289
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"

Really? If you're talking about this thread - yes, that's true. If you're talking about the board in general - do we really have any idea how many people know the information? Who knows what?

I think this is why we're voting - to find out.


Sean K - Jul 25, 2003 9:23:11 am PDT #1920 of 10289
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

I'ma just let Cindy speak for me from now on.