People talk about see something say something, but everyone knew the kid was a time bomb. He legally owned the assault rifle and all the social media scary shit photos and talk wasn't illegal. He was expelled from school for his violence, yet he was able to walk into the school with smoke bombs, a gas mask, and assault rifle.
Everything in his history screamed this guy should not own weaponry, and yet not illegal.
I have to once again steadfastly avoid gun loving family and friends because I am the one that can't be civil.
I don't understand what the authorities are supposed to do about someone who seems dangerous but hasn't broken any laws.
Laura, that was exactly the point I just made on FB to someone who was talking about "warning signs"
I don't understand what the authorities are supposed to do about someone who seems dangerous but hasn't broken any laws.
I know. And yet we have to find a way to solve this.
Totally jealous of the 22222 post! Two is my number.
I know. And yet we have to find a way to solve this.
I don't think there are any politically viable solutions.
Totally jealous of the 22222 post! Two is my number
And I didn't even do it on purpose!
If requiring a firearms license to own or purchase a firearm was politically viable, then I think there are things that could be done. Revoking or denying a license for domestic violence would be really helpful.
The problem is that literally nothing is politically viable, apparently.
I wish you all could take advantage of the glorious distraction that is the conversation on my local NextDoor site, started with a simple question: "Is fluoride bad?"
The problem is that literally nothing is politically viable, apparently.
That's what I found so frustrating about the bump-stocks. We can't even outlaw something that exists solely to get around existing laws? It's not I think outlawing bump-stocks is going to save a bunch of lives, it's just such a low bar and even that is too much.
