I actively avoid horror movies (I didn't even see Cabin in the Woods, and yes, I know it's different, but no, I *still* don't plan to see it, so you don't need to tell me I should see it), and I've been regarding Get Out in the same light. But *maybe* I'll see it. I'm intrigued.
'Lessons'
Buffista Movies Across the 8th Dimension!
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Steph, me too (I also haven't seen Cabin In the Woods, though more from laziness than deliberate avoidance on my part), and I'm SO glad I got talked into seeing Get Out anyway.
For the record, I am not generally a fan of horror either.
Get Out is so much more than a horror film.
Get Out is barely a horror movie. I'd call it a thriller with horror elements? Unlike Cabin In the Woods, which is 100% a horror movie (along with being a big chunk of other stuff).
I was sort of spoiled, and it was still great.
Just saw Get Out and, yes, what everyone said. That's an interesting horror/thriller distinction. Do You think horor has to have some supernatural elements? Or is it a tone thing?
I guess both? I don't think I know how to articulate it.
Yeah, it definitely felt like a horror movie to me, not a thriller, but I'm not sure why.
I'd certainly put movies like Halloween or the first Friday the 13th movie firmly in the horror category despite not really having supernatural elements. Maybe the distinction is that horror involves more visceral fear, whereas thrillers are mostly suspense?
Yes! I think that is where I would draw that line. Thanks, Matt!
This conversation makes me realize I really need to write up the rest of my Horror series.
One thing that was interesting to see was how the subject of "horror" films changed over time between the 1930s and the 1960s, moving from actual monsters (either man-made or supernatural breaches of nature) to more nebulous, psychological ones (very few serial killers prior to the 1960s for example). In one sense, this shift makes it hard to identify what horror is because those films don't really seem scary now (at least to me, YSMV).
I think the best definition I found that encapsulates both classic horror and today's horror (vs thriller) is "the intrusion of an evil force or event into the everyday world." They both have suspense in that things aren't exactly what they seem/you don't exactly know what's going to happen, but one is more fear-based. Sort of true evil vs. everyday/realistic evil (criminals, shadowy governments and the like).