I will have to check it out. It doesn’t sound much like the source material, which is about a Halloween party in England. So maybe more just a movie….
I enjoyed it quite a bit but the plot has about as much in common with its Agatha Christie source novel as KNIVES OUT did. Maybe less.
I really just don't like Branagh's version of Poirot, I think. I found it a very frustrating movie because there were parts of it I liked a lot but the parts that struck me wrong really overshadowed anything else. And that's been true of all three, I'm pretty sure. I did not refamiliarize myself with Halloween Party before watching this one, so I don't think it's divergence from canon as such that bothered me except in a broad that-is-not-how-that-character-is sense that is probably much more headcanon than actual canon
I had many opinions about the Poirot backstory in Death of the Nile. Though the TV adaptations have done worse to Miss Marple.
Both of those are wrong and bad (assuming that you are referring to the travesty I am thinking of wrt Marple and I am pretty sure you are)
Did they make Miss Marple a WWI veteran, too?
I wish. They added a tragic backstory where her MARRIED lover was killed in WWI.
Miss Marple would NEVER.
I don't know what these people are thinking.
I wish. They added a tragic backstory where her MARRIED lover was killed in WWI.
Miss Marple would NEVER.
See this is why I generally stick to the books. I have actually seen very few adaptations.
Congrats, amych! That is really cool! eta: yes, this was for Natter
Special one-night theatrical release of the remastered version of
The Abyss
[link]
I may have to go, if only for my young crush on both Ed Harris and Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio