I also love Holiday! I have played Susan Potter (Nick Potter’s wife). I am not sure if she exists in the movie because I haven’t watched in 20 years! But she was extremely fun to play- I used my Anya “I will barf too!” Imitation.
Buffista Movies Across the 8th Dimension!
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
I have played Susan Potter (Nick Potter’s wife). I am not sure if she exists in the movie because I haven’t watched in 20 years!
Oh indeed she's in the movie and delightful. It's one of Jacqueline's favorite screwballs, and Neddy is on her short list of all-time Woobies.
Oh indeed she's in the movie and delightful. It's one of Jacqueline's favorite screwballs, and Neddy is on her short list of all-time Woobies.
I think my love for Lew Ayres in Holiday is one reason I loved All Quiet on the Western Front so much.
I have played Susan Potter (Nick Potter’s wife). I am not sure if she exists in the movie because I haven’t watched in 20 years!
I can't remember the name of the actress in the '38 version but in the '30 version it's Hedda Hopper!
Oh indeed she's in the movie and delightful. It's one of Jacqueline's favorite screwballs, and Neddy is on her short list of all-time Woobies.
My Nick Potter actor was way too young for me in reality, but I sort of fell in acting love with him! But it was so much fun to play, and I so rarely act. It made me want to act again (I was doing it as a a favor to a director friend). But it is fun that Hedda Hopper played her, and that helps me see why he asked me (He is known for his whole directing style is casting the right person and just letting them go).
The Potters are absolute marriage goals. As much as I love everything else about the film as it unfolds, I got sucked in on the very first watch in the very first couple of minutes as poor Johnny Case is standing outside their apartment door ringing the bell and pounding on the door, and they're both sitting serenely in their comfy chairs in front of a fire, buried in books and newspapers with more books and newspapers stacked up all around them, and they're both so warm and content and happily lost that neither wants to be the one to set down their reading and answer the damn door.
I thought I’d make a double feature of Murder on the Orient Express and Death in the Nile after work yesterday, but I got too sleepy to finish the second one. Woke up early for whatever reason and finished it off this morning. Now, there are a lot of choices made in Branagh’s adaptations that I don’t mind or actively applaud but there are definitely some that grate. Perhaps foremost among the latter is giving not only Poirot but specifically the famous moustaches a tragic backstory. I do not approve. No.
They did the same thing to Jean-Luc Picard this season. I mean, not the moustache—they gave him a new, tragic backstory that they never referred to before. So unnecessary.
Argh. Stop that, people!
I do keep forgetting to watch Picard. I should get on that.
They did the same thing to Jean-Luc Picard this season. I mean, not the moustache—they gave him a new, tragic backstory that they never referred to before. So unnecessary.
I haven't watched past the first few episodes of the first season, but I've heard that Q is messing around with the timestream this season. Is it possible that the tragic backstory could be new within the narrative as well as on a meta level?
I think I am into this Nic Cage playing himself movie