That is a ridiculous policy! We are tiny and don't do evaluations. If people aren't up to expectations I work with them to get them up to expectations or get rid of them.
Mal ,'Bushwhacked'
Natter 72: We Were Unprepared for This
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Speaking of work, I really need to get my butt out the door and to the office....
I realize it is likely a common corporate thing, but really, it doesn't fit the culture here at all and has been pissing off the main contract folk for a bit. I expect the all hands meeting with the corporate overlords to be ugly. Hell, I might just make it ugly.
More adventures in recruiting. The recruiter has passed on a message from a client, who wants to know how long it would take me to write "a blog".
Oh dear.
how long it would take me to write "a blog".
Prepare for a follow-up question about whether you can make "a Facebook" for them.
The managers are under intense pressure to adhere to the distribution that requires 40% of employees to be rated below expectations.
We're pretty hardcore on rating distributions but that's way out there.
Ugh sarameg, that's an ugly policy. We have a bit of it where I work but it's more along the lines of what Jessica says:
I don't know if our eval policy is that strict, but all the managers do get a stern "Not all of your employees are above expectations" email every year.
A blog or a blog post, Dana? I suppose they didn't specify.
A blog or a blog post, Dana? I suppose they didn't specify.
Nope, that was the extent of the question.
Well at least that clarifies whether or not you'd want to work there.