I find the fact that she went from saying "this person" to broadcasting the person's name repeatedly less than cool. I can see being upset, and I feel like in those circumstances I would be too, but it does seem like she went for the nuclear option awfully early in the grievance process.

Yeah, the fact that she went straight to the Internet to complain rather than talking to the person she had the issue with doesn't lend much credibility to her outrage.

Maria, good thoughts headed your way today.

Jilli, procedure~ma for your dad.

I gotta say, I was pretty freaked by the whole "party in my room without my knowledge" thing, quite aside from how she did or didn't handle things and with whom and when, and "come up to my room" feels really different to me from "come along to someone else's room".

I mean, clearly, a big bunch of miscommunication happened somewhere along the line, and I have no clue about the personalities/histories/social dynamics involved. My gut just sides with she-whose-boundaries-feel-violated, I guess.

Heya - I don't post in Bitches much anymore - moves too fast! But I'm friends with the blogger in question and she saw the trackback here and asked me to check in.

For what it's worth, I believe her and I trust her statement. I know how upset she's been, and I think it's difficult to judge from outside what kind of strange dynamics might be going on that we can't see on the surface.

I read it on her site and was a little flabbergasted. I know that I would never open up someone else's room as a con-wide party. But then, I have enough social anxiety, that I wait for explicit invitations to bring myself.

And I can understand her concern for the security of her things, having people going through what was out, having to clean up after the party, and possibly having to pay for damages.

Not sure if it's overreacting, but I can see being concerned.

My gut just sides with she-whose-boundaries-feel-violated, I guess.

I would, too. 100%.

quite aside from how she did or didn't handle things and with whom and when

Right; I think it could have been handled better, but that's a separate thing from feeling your boundaries were violated by what happened. She gets to have those boundaries, and she gets to have those feelings.

But I'm friends with the blogger in question and she saw the trackback here and asked me to check in.

I think I was vaguely aware of the connection, Sox--I generally quite enjoy her weekly links posts.

I wasn't intending to cast doubt on her feelings or her rights to them at all--even if she had agreed to everything to start with (which I'm not saying she did), she'd be perfectly within her rights to be upset later. And I certainly don't know any of the people involved. It was more of a question of "I go to a lot of conventions, and could totally see myself being any of the people in this situation" (person with room, since I'm often the one with a decent credit limit, roommate, person inviting myself to a "makeup party", person getting invited to said party by someone who isn't actually paying for the room, etc) and wasn't sure if my reactions in this situation would be something totally considered inappropriate by most/many/all people? The calling out by name was a bit startling as well--had she written a post being like "I did X, someone else did Y, and I feel Z about that, people should be aware that this sort of situation can engender those feelings" I'd still have the same question about if that was a common feeling, but be less taken aback by the whole post?

I think it probably has to be looked at in the context of recent drama in the sf/f fandom. There's been a lot of discussion and problems with harassment at cons, and how cons should respond to them, so that's probably contributing a vibe to the whole thing.