Yeah, I associate that with warrants and searches and the like.
May have been the losing side. Still not convinced it was the wrong one.
Mal ,'Bushwhacked'
Natter 70: Hookers and Blow
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
-t - May 22, 2012 3:55:13 pm PDT #6287 of 30001
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration
§ ita § - May 22, 2012 3:58:13 pm PDT #6288 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Wikipedia just confused me. I'm just going to live my entire life for the cameras. Feel free to drop by my balcony later, eh?
tommyrot - May 22, 2012 4:05:07 pm PDT #6289 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
bon bon - May 22, 2012 4:32:52 pm PDT #6290 of 30001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.
Just reading that, and not knowing really anything about the legality of photos, I suspect the poster doesn't know what he/she is talking about because he/she doesn't distinguish between civil and criminal liability.
ETA: I mean, there's just no way it's a crime to take a picture in an AA meeting, so...does he mean you could get sued for violating someone's privacy? Sure. But I'm not comfortable with calling those activities "illegal."
smonster - May 22, 2012 4:44:32 pm PDT #6291 of 30001
We won’t stop until everyone is gay.
"I'm So Goth I Shit Bats" Completed Cross Stitch by DefiantDamsel
I think this one might have more widespread Buffista appeal [link]
Consuela - May 22, 2012 4:49:24 pm PDT #6292 of 30001
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix
But I'm not comfortable with calling those activities "illegal."
Indeed not. If AA meetings are held in rented spaces, they're likely not, in fact, public, and the renting entity has a right to exclude or control the activity in the room, including photography. Failure to comply would be enforceable with physical security, or with a civil tort claim.
That's my read, anyway.
Matt the Bruins fan - May 22, 2012 5:31:29 pm PDT #6293 of 30001
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
DavidS - May 22, 2012 6:04:46 pm PDT #6294 of 30001
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
I give you Swinton: [link]
SWINTON!
Wow.
tommyrot - May 22, 2012 6:07:51 pm PDT #6295 of 30001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
SWINTON!
Wow.
Seconded.
§ ita § - May 22, 2012 6:23:25 pm PDT #6296 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I had a post in mind, clicked on the SWINTON, and have absolutely no idea what I'd been going to say.
Mostly because of the SWINTON and everything inherent there, but also a little bit because of the MPREG.