Also, yikes to Liese's Dave! Poor him.
Isn't "expectation of privacy" a legal thing?
'Help'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Also, yikes to Liese's Dave! Poor him.
Isn't "expectation of privacy" a legal thing?
Yeah, I associate that with warrants and searches and the like.
Wikipedia just confused me. I'm just going to live my entire life for the cameras. Feel free to drop by my balcony later, eh?
Just reading that, and not knowing really anything about the legality of photos, I suspect the poster doesn't know what he/she is talking about because he/she doesn't distinguish between civil and criminal liability.
ETA: I mean, there's just no way it's a crime to take a picture in an AA meeting, so...does he mean you could get sued for violating someone's privacy? Sure. But I'm not comfortable with calling those activities "illegal."
"I'm So Goth I Shit Bats" Completed Cross Stitch by DefiantDamsel
I think this one might have more widespread Buffista appeal [link]
But I'm not comfortable with calling those activities "illegal."
Indeed not. If AA meetings are held in rented spaces, they're likely not, in fact, public, and the renting entity has a right to exclude or control the activity in the room, including photography. Failure to comply would be enforceable with physical security, or with a civil tort claim.
That's my read, anyway.
I give you Swinton: [link]
SWINTON!
Wow.
SWINTON!
Wow.
Seconded.