So I shoot Dave too. No problem. I'd wait till he heals to be nice, but that will make the comparison less accurate.
And...that was tasteless.
Interesting lifehacker post about your rights taking photos: [link] . Interesting commentary too, but in the end I feel no less hesitant about candids of strangers than before.
They mention "expectation of privacy" and AA in conjunction a couple of times. Does AA have a legal expectation of privacy, or is it inherent in the name, or the rules of the organisation? I mean, how far do I have to go to establish *this* roomful of people having an expectation of privacy, when the group that meets in the same room in an hour might not?
Box jellyfish who were angered by raging anemones!
Yeah. During the next six weeks we are supposed to: finish the school year and close up the house, travel to Kansas, board meeting, vbs, travel to Illinois, wedding, music festival, travel to Indiana. And then the hard work starts. Including more vbs and a camp and then an eight week, ten state tour.
So.
"Pretty bad tear" is the verdict. Walking cast for now and ortho guy later.
"Pretty bad tear" is the verdict. Walking cast for now and ortho guy later.
This is not super compatible with the above outlined agenda.
Are there spoiler standards for facebook? One of my friends posted that he was pissed off at last night's episode of House. I commented on that post, asking what had pissed him off about it, and mentioning one plot point that I thought didn't make sense. One of his friends then posted at me in all caps for posting a spoiler. I've been scrolling past a bunch of discussion of Sherlock, since I haven't seen the latest episode yet, and I figured that something that's already aired, and which is mentioned in the original status, is fair game for comments on that status.
Crap. Medical crises just derail everything so damned fast.
Good god, if you know a 7:30am meeting is cancelled, why not tell people?
Does AA have a legal expectation of privacy, or is it inherent in the name, or the rules of the organisation? I mean, how far do I have to go to establish *this* roomful of people having an expectation of privacy, when the group that meets in the same room in an hour might not?
It is in the rules of the organization, which are (IME) posted on every visible wall surface available, and stated explicitly by the meeting leader before they begin. It would take an immense amount of stupid to be present at an AA meeting and think it was ok to take pictures.
