Yuck msbelle. Sending you many hugs.

I have no motivation to do anything. There are things to be done, mind you, I just have no motivation.

Sorry your day is Clusterfucky, msbelle.

You should declare it the Clusterfuckiest and take a detached but focused attitude to fix what you can when you can. Get Zen, baby! 'Cuz it's the Clusterfuckiest.

Happy birthday, Kat! Cupcakes!

Maker Faire Detroit: The Girl Who Plays with Fieros Interview

So cool. I had to share that with certain Rookie editors, and Matilda's Aunt Angela who got burned out doing counseling with at-risk teens so took a training course and worked as a car mechanic for a couple years.

Happy birthday, Kat!!!

______________

And msbelle, I'm sorry your day is the clusterfuckysuckiest. DO NOT WANT.

If a community is opposed to discrimination, isn't that enough reason to keep Chick-fil-A out?

Only if there's a legal mechanism. A government entity is bound by the constitutional guarantees of free speech, and cannot punish a business for exercising that right, no matter how much the local community may disagree with the content of the speech.

IIRC, San Francisco requires all its vendors to provide domestic partner benefits, but could not cancel a contract with a vendor if the board helped fund Prop 8, unless they'd done something else to run afoul of their laws and regs.

Boston will have to approve Chik-Fil-A's applications for opening a store, and grant permits to them, and they may be more strict and difficult than they would otherwise be, but I don't think there's a legal mechanism for forbidding them outright to operate in the city.

Boston will have to approve Chik-Fil-A's applications for opening a store, and grant permits to them, and they may be more strict and difficult than they would otherwise be, but I don't think there's a legal mechanism for forbidding them outright to operate in the city.

Hmmm, I'm not familiar enough with Boston to know if the mayor legally can prevent Chik-Fil-A from opening.

OK, say we're talking about Chicago, where the elected alderman has considerable latitude in granting or denying permits. AFAIK the alderman can legally deny Chik-Fil-A's application for opening a store. Then I would agree with the decision to keep Chik-Fil-A from opening a store in the alderman's ward.

Say it's the reverse situation, and a conservative community doesn't want a business that's known for its advocacy of gay rights to open a store. Assume it's like Chicago and an elected official has enough leeway to legally prevent the company from opening the store. Let's say that does happen. While I would not like the outcome, democracy often results in outcomes I don't like.

To what extent could keeping Chik-Fil-A out of a city be comparable to legislation in certain states (Mississippi comes to mind) imposing such stringent (and, as I understand, unnecessary to health and safety) restrictions on clinics that perform abortions as to effectively close them down? In that context, I note that there is a U.S. Supreme Court decision expressly finding a Constitutional right to obtain an abortion (agree with it or disagree with it -- it is out there) but none to sell chicken sandwiches.

In that context, I note that there is a U.S. Supreme Court decision expressly finding a Constitutional right to obtain an abortion (agree with it or disagree with it -- it is out there) but none to sell chicken sandwiches.

If the courts decide Chik-Fil-A has a legal right to open a store where other restaurants are allowed, or if a law is passed to establish that right, well... then that's what happens.

Spanish question for a manuscipt:

Would a person be names Maria de Guadalupe Sanchez, or would it be Maria Guadalupe de Sanchez?

(I gotta run to Target, but I appreciate any insight.)

It... depends on what her name is? If she's named after the Virgin of Guadalupe, it could very well be the former. If her father's last name is Guadalupe and her mother's is Sanchez, then the latter.

Also, msbelle, your boss does sound like an asshole.