Yeah, those letters don't go together under the oversimplified heading of "dissent." I'm not sure why he's trying to wrap them all up that way.
Natter 69: Practically names itself.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I mean, I'm CLEARLY not excusing what he did. CLEARLY.
Maybe he's in a place that where he's a hammer and everything looks like a nail.
Timelies all!
Happy Birthday ChiKat!
Happy Birthday, Chikat!
Stephanie, are you still interested in the TJs exchange?
Perkins, I've been meaning to email you. Yes, but meara already gifted me with awesome TJs stuff AND I'm going to be in Albuquerque next week, where they have a TJs. So I think at the moment, I can be a sender instead of a sendee.
eta: and I'm sorry to all grammar types for using "gift" as a verb. It just sort of slipped out.
But we need more senders and less sendees.
Can I overrule you on that?
I'll will be very happy to participate in any capacity. (you mean, I'm receiving instead of sending, right?) Especially if the result is TJs yumminess. And then if I don't make it to TJs over the weekend (it's like 1.5 hours from my parents), I won't be crushed.
Clearly not, Allyson. Sullivan's not always the most careful reader.
None of those letters are excusing what he did. At most, they're trying to explain why it happened, which is a long way from excusing it.
I might argue that McQueary is a few points higher on the depraved depraved scale, because at least he didn't lie to a grand jury.
(Okay, it's a typo, but now I'm kind of fond of the depraved depraved scale.)