I adore my 4.5 quart KitchenAid, but I'm still making eyes at the 7-quart Commercial model: [link]
Book ,'Objects In Space'
Natter 69: Practically names itself.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Taibbi has privilege, sure. That's all true.
However, she doesn't (and I don't have to) write apologetically, or try and reason with fuckers who are never going to get it. You can write like you have privilege.
Right. She didn't have to insulate her point with all the details about how awesome her life is in order to justify saying single is okay, and I had a similar reaction of "okay, but I haven't had a fifteen year string of satisfying monogamous relationships and fascinating travel yadda yadda, so where does that leave me?"
(I should caveat that I read the article a while ago, so I'm going off remembered impressions.)
So I didn't mean to derail. Just to make the point that Taibbi et al are even a further step removed than you noted.
My mother's KitchenAid is sitting unused in her condo, because she hasn't cooked in probably four years and my dad is mostly limited to grilling things and boiling things. But she claims she still uses it, and probably believes that, so I just sit on my hands. I do have an acceptable mixer (a Sunbeam), it's not like I'm suffering.
I have my maternal grandmother's china, but I never use it and it's a very boring cream-and-pink-rose pattern that I don't much like. At some point I'll probably Ebay it.
I'm with you on what male writers get in terms of privilege, and I think it's been brought up throughout the femiblogosphere as well, that women get cover stories when it's about babies and relationships and that's pretty much it.
But I think that's a different issue. We're talking about writing with a million qualifiers, excuses, rationalizations. She didn't have to do that if her piece was just a Livejournal post, you know?
Which all leads me to a new question: Did they put her photo on the cover to show that she's conventionally attractive to further qualify that "there's nothing wrong with her"?
Did they put her photo on the cover to show that she's conventionally attractive to further qualify that "there's nothing wrong with her"?
That, or because sexy women on the cover sells magazines.
I've been looking into getting K-Bug a KitchenAid for Christmas. In looking at their site, they have refurbished models on sale for a decent price. Does anyone have any experience with refurbished models? Anything I should look for/avoid?
It's the Atlantic, not FHM.
I inherited my grandmother's kitchen aid. Lord knows how old it is (old enough that it is not a three-prong plug), but it works fine! I did at some point lose the meat grinder attachment she had. And I've never used the dough hook.
I have my paternal grandmother's second-best china, which is also a cream-and-pink-rose pattern. I am rather of fond of it mostly because it has everything, including cream soups. My mother sold the first-best china, in part because we have inherited so much china and it was worth the most, but mostly because she always resented the fact that we weren't good enough for the good china.