because the bible is inherently anti-feminist, because G-d raped Mary.

Er, say what now? At least in all the Bible teaching I've heard, God ASKED, and she said yes! I mean, per Catholic teachings she was all special-born-without-sin blah blah, so I guess she didn't have a choice in THAT part, but...are we talking statutory here?

Er, say what now? At least in all the Bible teaching I've heard, God ASKED, and she said yes! I mean, per Catholic teachings she was all special-born-without-sin blah blah, so I guess she didn't have a choice in THAT part, but...are we talking statutory here?

I have no idea. I was trying not to get into that part of the argument, since I was arguing that the entire thing was irrelevant to a discussion of Judaism.

StW texted me this morning, asking if I had NYE plans. He texted me first and I haven't answered him yet. I WIN.

BWAH! But go team you!

I am slowly becoming less invested in caring about M's mom's antics; I know it doesn't SEEM like it, because I bitch here all the time, but I HAVE to share some of the craxy, and then I let it go.

Aren't y'all LUCKY?! /sarcasm

I think the feminist blog comment thread argument (it was on feministing several years ago) that made me roll my eyes the most was, for a post about a new book looking at Judaism and the Hebrew Bible from a feminist perspective, someone was arguing at length that it's impossible to look at the bible from a feminist perspective, because the bible is inherently anti-feminist, because G-d raped Mary

Hil, REALLY?! That's insaneovision.

Well, to be fair, the bible isn't too awesome toward women.

Why is Mary in the Old Testament?

I mean - I agree with Hil - how is Mary relevant to a discussion of Judaism?

how is Mary relevant to a discussion of Judaism?

fair question.

At least in all the Bible teaching I've heard, God ASKED, and she said yes!

I don't recall that part. Maybe it's there, I just remember the Annunciation (not called the Asking, after all), not Mary's response.

G-d raped Mary

Ew. I never saw it THAT way. It was a gift. An inconvenient, awkward gift that almost got her forcibly divorced, but still.

I was arguing that the entire thing was irrelevant to a discussion of Judaism.

It's a little disheartening that that had to be pointed out.

An inconvenient, awkward gift that almost got her forcibly divorced

They weren't married yet. (I only know because we looked it up a couple of weeks before, when Tim referred to Mary as an unwed mother, and I said no, they were married, Joseph just wasn't the baby daddy. Then I said, "Do we even HAVE a Bible?" [Both of us used to belong to (different) freak-ass churches, so we don't have any religious stuff around (except what his Dad gives us).] Lo and behold, we do have a Bible, so we looked it up, and Mary and Joseph were not yet wed when she became pregnant. I think they still weren't wed when she gave birth, but I'm not 100% on that.)

Religion weird.

I'm mostly disturbed by the fact that we've lived together for 4 years and I didn't know if we had a Bible. I mean, I *know* the books in this house.