Well, to be fair, the bible isn't too awesome toward women.
Spike's Bitches 47: Someone Dangerous Could Get In
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Why is Mary in the Old Testament?
I mean - I agree with Hil - how is Mary relevant to a discussion of Judaism?
how is Mary relevant to a discussion of Judaism?
fair question.
At least in all the Bible teaching I've heard, God ASKED, and she said yes!
I don't recall that part. Maybe it's there, I just remember the Annunciation (not called the Asking, after all), not Mary's response.
G-d raped Mary
Ew. I never saw it THAT way. It was a gift. An inconvenient, awkward gift that almost got her forcibly divorced, but still.
I was arguing that the entire thing was irrelevant to a discussion of Judaism.
It's a little disheartening that that had to be pointed out.
An inconvenient, awkward gift that almost got her forcibly divorced
They weren't married yet. (I only know because we looked it up a couple of weeks before, when Tim referred to Mary as an unwed mother, and I said no, they were married, Joseph just wasn't the baby daddy. Then I said, "Do we even HAVE a Bible?" [Both of us used to belong to (different) freak-ass churches, so we don't have any religious stuff around (except what his Dad gives us).] Lo and behold, we do have a Bible, so we looked it up, and Mary and Joseph were not yet wed when she became pregnant. I think they still weren't wed when she gave birth, but I'm not 100% on that.)
Religion weird.
I'm mostly disturbed by the fact that we've lived together for 4 years and I didn't know if we had a Bible. I mean, I *know* the books in this house.
I don't know if I have a bible either, actually. I think I donated it before I moved up here. A lot of books didn't make the cut.
It's a little disheartening that that had to be pointed out.
Yeah. I mean, I'm used to people who think that Judaism is just Christianity minus Jesus, but I don't think I've ever had to argue that argument before.
Thanks to cleaning out my grandmother's/mother's house, I have like five Bibles now. I still have the KJV I used for five years as my textbook in high school bible class.
They weren't married yet.
I guess I knew that. If they had been married, Joseph wouldn't have been surprised or concerned about finding her pregnant, right? I remember the line (verse?) that when he found out, Joseph "was minded to put her away privily." I interpreted that as a private, quiet breaking of their bond, which I thought of as marriage but I guess it was engagement.
Still, her showing up pregnant and NOT married was even more awkward.