'Serenity'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I really don't care to talk about sex with my friends. That's my boundary.
lisah! Thanks for the link in press. I think I just found an early xmas/bday gift for the brother (the t, not the dress.) I gave him the Firefly set one year, he forgot I gave it to him, then went on and on about how I had to see this show and the movie and set one of his car race videos to the theme...I was laughing so hard.
If it was titled "Porn This Straight Woman Likes" I'd dig it.
Yeah, that makes more sense.
"OMG, can't you just tell us good blowjob techniques without being weird and overly sexual about it?!?"
Um.
Bwah! That takes me back to the 2002 f2f.
Now, that's a fine line to walk.
...I guess you had to be there. It started with tips on gag reflexes, and there were dildos, but then her girlfriend was there adn she was flouncing around, showing off her underwear, and going down on a wrench sticking out of someone's pants...
If it was titled "Porn This Straight Woman Likes" I'd dig it.
But wait. Isn't that what any list of "good" stuff is? The stuff the person making the list likes?
John Rogers talks like Fran Lebowitz.
Trufax.
I recently read some random thing about clutching your thumb in your fist for suppressing a gag reflex. Makes no sense, but weirder things happen all the time.
Isn't that what any list of "good" stuff is? The stuff the person making the list likes?
The list doesn't say it's good. It says it's for straight women. It implies the gender and the orientation is the unifying factor, not even the quality. I contend they're not useful or significant criteria.
I'm assuming all the stuff that Fleshbot recs is supposed to be good.
Now, that's a fine line to walk.
...I guess you had to be there. It started with tips on gag reflexes, and there were dildos, but then her girlfriend was there adn she was flouncing around, showing off her underwear, and going down on a wrench sticking out of someone's pants...
Ha! I totally get it.
The list doesn't say it's good. It says it's for straight women. It implies the gender and the orientation is the unifying factor, not even the quality. I contend they're not useful or significant criteria.
I hear what you are saying, but would have to do more research to have a position.
Not like that.
The list doesn't say it's good. It says it's for straight women. It implies the gender and the orientation is the unifying factor, not even the quality.
If it's recommended, it's implied it's good. You are still losing this argument, commie.